Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)After Suing The CIA, Human Rights Group Burglarized – All Evidence Needed For Lawsuit Stolen [View all]
Some stuff to keep from falling down the Memory Hole...

After Suing The CIA, Human Rights Group Burglarized All Evidence Needed For Lawsuit Stolen
By John Vibes
ActivistPost, Oct. 23, 2015
The University of Washingtons Center for Human Rights was recently burglarized after they filed a lawsuit against the CIA for refusing to release declassified documents to the public. Data and equipment were stolen from the office, and it is suspected that the CIA may have had something to do with the break-in. The specific documents in question that the group was filing the lawsuit over were also stolen from the office.
SNIP...
The center filed the lawsuit just weeks ago, on October 2nd. The lawsuit alleged that the CIA violated the Freedom of Information Act by withholding information about the 1981 Santa Cruz massacre in El Salvador.
The Santa Cruz massacre was carried out by an elite puppet dictatorship that was heavily backed and influenced by the CIA and the US government. The military forces, led by Lt. Colonel Sigifredo Ochoa Pérez, killed hundreds of innocent civilians who were fleeing the gunfire. The CIA has spent decades protecting Pérez, and keeping the war crimes that took place a secret. However, Pérez is currently on trial in El Salvador, and the declassified CIA files could actually help with the case against him.
The CIAs denial of our request is not credible. The CIA has previously declassified 20 documents relating to Ochoa. Why didnt they at least give us copies of those same documents? There can be no national security concerns about documents that have already been made public, Mina Manuchehri, one of the lawsuits plaintiffs said in a recent article.
Pérez was a favorite of the US military Col. John Waghlestein, head of the U.S. Military Advisory Group said in a 1987 interview that One of the things we tried to do, we kind of jokingly say wed like to do, is clone Ochoa because he was so effective.
CONTINUED...
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/10/after-suing-the-cia-human-rights-group-burglarized-all-evidence-needed-for-lawsuit-stolen.html
By John Vibes
ActivistPost, Oct. 23, 2015
The University of Washingtons Center for Human Rights was recently burglarized after they filed a lawsuit against the CIA for refusing to release declassified documents to the public. Data and equipment were stolen from the office, and it is suspected that the CIA may have had something to do with the break-in. The specific documents in question that the group was filing the lawsuit over were also stolen from the office.
SNIP...
The center filed the lawsuit just weeks ago, on October 2nd. The lawsuit alleged that the CIA violated the Freedom of Information Act by withholding information about the 1981 Santa Cruz massacre in El Salvador.
The Santa Cruz massacre was carried out by an elite puppet dictatorship that was heavily backed and influenced by the CIA and the US government. The military forces, led by Lt. Colonel Sigifredo Ochoa Pérez, killed hundreds of innocent civilians who were fleeing the gunfire. The CIA has spent decades protecting Pérez, and keeping the war crimes that took place a secret. However, Pérez is currently on trial in El Salvador, and the declassified CIA files could actually help with the case against him.
The CIAs denial of our request is not credible. The CIA has previously declassified 20 documents relating to Ochoa. Why didnt they at least give us copies of those same documents? There can be no national security concerns about documents that have already been made public, Mina Manuchehri, one of the lawsuits plaintiffs said in a recent article.
Pérez was a favorite of the US military Col. John Waghlestein, head of the U.S. Military Advisory Group said in a 1987 interview that One of the things we tried to do, we kind of jokingly say wed like to do, is clone Ochoa because he was so effective.
CONTINUED...
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/10/after-suing-the-cia-human-rights-group-burglarized-all-evidence-needed-for-lawsuit-stolen.html
The Guardian picked up on the story. For some reason, it hasn't been mentioned here in Detroit or on my television screen.
Gee. Another coincidence.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Suing The CIA, Human Rights Group Burglarized – All Evidence Needed For Lawsuit Stolen [View all]
Octafish
Oct 2015
OP
it's so insanely un-democratic and contrary to our supposed principles...
Fast Walker 52
Oct 2015
#53
Yes they can. The next phase is that they come in the front door with guns and demand
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#48
They will do it because they can. They are getting bolder and bolder and it's being normalized.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#69
They've killed more than one. But the answer is the same. When the bullet has "property of the CIA"
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#84
hey, I remember CISPES--death-squad goons let into Los Angeles to rob what they could
MisterP
Oct 2015
#10
was witness documents, names?/statements?. Stuff the buglers can use to snuff 'witnesses'
Sunlei
Oct 2015
#42
I didn't realize "that most CIA documents are exempt from FOIA" Center for Human rights,
Sunlei
Oct 2015
#25
Yeah, most likely. I've heard he was a Dem until he became famous and had some power. Figures.
BlueJazz
Oct 2015
#74
"and it is suspected that the CIA may have had something to do with the break-in"
Matariki
Oct 2015
#29
that's because you believe the US is a democracy of good will and fair intentions
librechik
Oct 2015
#71
this is so obviously and memorably what the CIA/etc does, it's modus operandus
librechik
Oct 2015
#77