Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
8. Uh, THEY own the assets. And run them.
Fri May 25, 2012, 06:53 PM
May 2012

Why can't they buy it or build just like their old master/owner/boss did? They can borrow, if they can make a business plan, read a balance sheet. And assets are assets, anything that people want or is used to make such.

But buy them a farm? Like this?

"It was dem Carpetbaggers dat ‘stroyed de country. Dey went an’ turned us loose, jus’ lak a passel o’ cattle, an’ didn’ show us nothin’ or giv’ us nothin’. Dey was acres an’ acres o’ lan’ not in use, an’ lots o’ timber in dis country. Dey should-a give each one o’ us a little farm an’ let us git out timber an’ build houses. Dey ought to put a white Marster over us, to show us an’ make us work, only let us be free ‘stead o’ slaves. I think dat could-a been better’n turnin’ us lak dey done."

From “Henri Necaise, ex-slave, Pearl River County,” image 122

"free 'stead o' slaves"?

Surely that's not what you are suggesting?

I tend to start with more respect for people than that.






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"I understand, for i...»Reply #8