Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
9. The "old rules" about the strength or weakness of an incumbent party no longer apply because the
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:04 PM
Oct 2015

Republican party has gerrymandered the nation to reflect a false parity between the parties.

In years past, there was some balance between the two major parties of the day because a party too far outside of the public mainstream would either evolve to better reflect the public's views or die for lack of support.

The modern Republican party has cheated this natural evolutionary process by gerrymandering congressional districts so extremely and so anti-democratically that they have been able to depart from the mainstream without being checked back toward more widely accepted views because they rigged the congressional election process.

As a result of the Republicans maintaining a majority of congressional seats with less than a majority of votes due to gerrymandering, they have evolved into a party with governmental power beyond what its minority level of actual support should warrant. This power grab has the negative consequence, however, that the Republican party is no longer geared toward winning a majority of votes -- just a majority of congressional seats.

The electoral college is not a direct vote for president, but it is not generally susceptible to gerrymandering, and so the Republican party faces a different handicap in presidential races than the obstacles any other political party has historically faced.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #1
Agreed! Attorney in Texas Oct 2015 #3
This is the best possible news we can get in light of historical trends. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #2
Technically, Gore won in 2000. That would have been 3 Dems in a row. yardwork Oct 2015 #4
Since Bush became President, Bush won. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #15
My point is that the people elected a Democrat three times in a row. yardwork Oct 2015 #17
The "old rules" about the strength or weakness of an incumbent party no longer apply because the Attorney in Texas Oct 2015 #9
Gerrymandering only impacts the House. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #16
I think the poster's point is that gerrymandering allowed the GOP to go extreme. yardwork Oct 2015 #18
I don't agree. Starting with Bush Sr. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #19
First, the "Rockafeller Republicans" weren't really "fiscally conservative socially liberal"). They Attorney in Texas Oct 2015 #20
I take exception to the continued use of the word "conservative" to describe them IDemo Oct 2015 #5
Agreed. Students of government once understood the distinction between conservative and reactionary Attorney in Texas Oct 2015 #8
The have AM Radio, TV news, the WSJ, both houses of Congress, the SCOTUS, maxsolomon Oct 2015 #6
Exactly. Arugula Latte Oct 2015 #7
It's not so much that liberals have moved to the left as society has moved to the left Johonny Oct 2015 #10
It is spooky when Boehner and Ryan are considered too liberal by so many elected congressmonsters Attorney in Texas Oct 2015 #11
Yet this fucked up party controls both the House and Senate FLPanhandle Oct 2015 #12
And the Supreme Court. n/t tabasco Oct 2015 #14
They are good followers and will rally around whatever nutcase tabasco Oct 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»538: "Maybe Republic...»Reply #9