Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SandersDem

(592 posts)
14. doesn't matter
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 09:01 PM
Oct 2015

they own it, it's basically bankrupt, they liquidate it and people get a small portion of their money back, but the big thing is the bank goes away and the economy sees a little stimulus. It also sends one helluva a message to stock holders of every other bank in Iceland. If that were done here, the too bigger to fail banks would break themselves up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Now that is bank regulation.. Good for them LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #1
I'm sure Hillary will do the same thing here mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #2
Yes, of course Hillary will .. Cuz she already told them to "CUT IT OUT!" 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #11
And Bernie will be soooooo much more successful. Amimnoch Oct 2015 #15
So you've resigned yourself to voting for that the GOP will allow. cui bono Oct 2015 #17
I dont see them resigning themselves to anything, they seem to me to just be pointing out that cstanleytech Oct 2015 #18
But if you really want to change something you have to vote for the person who is actually going to cui bono Oct 2015 #20
Yes, the only time failure is assured is when LuvNewcastle Oct 2015 #22
What good is trying if Congress is Republican? treestar Oct 2015 #33
It's a hell of a lot better than giving up or settling? cui bono Oct 2015 #38
That's the point, no one can do it with an R Congress treestar Oct 2015 #88
Amen. I'd rather go down swinging than fail like a meek, scared sheep. BlueJazz Oct 2015 #83
Wrong, the one who it really is any of the Republicans if they win. cstanleytech Oct 2015 #86
Oh hell no, not the GOP. Amimnoch Oct 2015 #30
note the meme "Bernie will at least try" as if that matters treestar Oct 2015 #34
So you'd rather have Hillary, who will not try to rein in the banks at all. cui bono Oct 2015 #39
No, I'm voting for Hillary who will reign in the banks. Amimnoch Oct 2015 #46
The Hillary who will "reign in the banks" hifiguy Oct 2015 #57
I absolutely disagree. cui bono Oct 2015 #79
Why would Hillary not try to rein them in treestar Oct 2015 #87
Really? You're siding with Wall Street against the people? cui bono Oct 2015 #90
Could you be more over simplistic? treestar Oct 2015 #91
What a completely disingenuous post. cui bono Oct 2015 #93
Of course it matters because the actual trying helps you to acquire the power and TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #89
Where has this idea come from that Bernie doesn't compromise in order to get things passed? cui bono Oct 2015 #42
It seems like you thesis is it won't happen mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #28
So your solution is to quit? Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #29
not at all. Amimnoch Oct 2015 #31
That's odd. There are Hillary supporters who can't WAIT to purge the Liberals from the party. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #55
The lists are being compiled hifiguy Oct 2015 #58
We're doing the same... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #62
I saw the name Thurgood Marshall, Jr there. hifiguy Oct 2015 #64
Amazing what money does to people. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #85
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #40
YMMV? Kingofalldems Oct 2015 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #43
So what does that have to do with Hillary Clinton? Kingofalldems Oct 2015 #44
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #45
It is fun to pretend Democratic candidates not of our choosing will eventually become fascis LanternWaste Oct 2015 #50
So what is the choice: bvar22 Oct 2015 #59
If that was the actual choice it would be. Amimnoch Oct 2015 #73
So you will choose a known zero, bvar22 Oct 2015 #74
At least Sanders is trying against all odds. Unknown Beatle Oct 2015 #75
I'm sure Hillary will do the same thing here AlbertCat Oct 2015 #23
chicken or the egg. quakerboy Oct 2015 #81
Agreed .... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2015 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author A HERETIC I AM Oct 2015 #4
for some it could be... 2naSalit Oct 2015 #8
Thanks for catching that -nt- 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #9
No worries A HERETIC I AM Oct 2015 #27
doesn't matter SandersDem Oct 2015 #14
more than you got, when the U.S. bailed out our banks. ish of the hammer Oct 2015 #21
Not true A HERETIC I AM Oct 2015 #26
That money would have ben better spent ish of the hammer Oct 2015 #53
Yes, it's always best to look at things from certain perspectives... A HERETIC I AM Oct 2015 #54
It's more like $233 AlbertCat Oct 2015 #24
KansDem down-string says it's actually MUCH more than that: $3,512.92 to be exact. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #66
30,000 ISK = $233.55 Orangepeel Oct 2015 #69
Cool. You were right after all. KansDem agrees with you now. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #72
Even easier, just type it in to a Google search D Gary Grady Oct 2015 #80
Its a matter of currency. SEK vs ISK quakerboy Oct 2015 #82
They could only do that thanks to the overwhelming power of the Icelandic military Fumesucker Oct 2015 #5
LOL, our military would protect the banks dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #6
Not so sure about the uniformed military. hifiguy Oct 2015 #60
Yes, I more or less said as much dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #71
K & R, need to fix the title though dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #7
done nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #10
K&R abelenkpe Oct 2015 #12
I suspect that the next scam devised by Wall Street banksters SDjack Oct 2015 #13
This is nicely documented in Michael Lewis's "Boomerang" erronis Oct 2015 #16
Wow, they are just rubbing it in our faces! Dam you Iceland! Rex Oct 2015 #19
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #25
If only our country had that kind of integrity! Rex Oct 2015 #35
Very different country with very different laws treestar Oct 2015 #32
For starters, GummyBearz Oct 2015 #36
I wish you'd consider making this an Op because it clearly snagglepuss Oct 2015 #47
I'm a not going to have time today GummyBearz Oct 2015 #49
Iceland is a "different country, it has nothing to do with us and our laws" 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #37
LOL! Rex Oct 2015 #48
Thanks 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #52
ANY country can have laws with integrity. hifiguy Oct 2015 #61
That is exaclty what we need to do. WDIM Oct 2015 #51
I can only offer the traditional Icelandic toast hifiguy Oct 2015 #56
That's $3,512.92!!! KansDem Oct 2015 #63
THANK YOU! AlbertCat up-string was claiming it was only $233 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #65
DAMN!!! KansDem Oct 2015 #70
I'm moving to Iceland. :) Catherine Vincent Oct 2015 #67
K&R!!!! Phlem Oct 2015 #68
That's about $234 rocktivity Oct 2015 #76
Yes, that has already been sorted out up-string. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #78
Which is $234 more than we got. hobbit709 Oct 2015 #92
Iceland showed us how to do it, all right Warpy Oct 2015 #77
Awesome! Go Iceland! n/t wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #84
You all realise that's the *conservative* solution, don't you? muriel_volestrangler Nov 2015 #94
Jailing Bankster Crooks is "conservative"? 99th_Monkey Nov 2015 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iceland jails crooked Ban...»Reply #14