Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
7. That's contingent upon costs keeping within that 10%. Vermont wasn't able to do so.
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 12:21 PM
Oct 2015

Remember, the state exchange is dropping 80,000 -- which is effectively everyone in it -- and as you noted insurance premiums are higher than 10% of payroll. If the insurance exchange can't work at a higher rate I don't see how CC can hold at its proposed 10%.

Also, according to the state constitution, all tax increases must be enacted through a ballot referendum. The CC initiative exempts the payroll tax from that requirement allowing the board to raise taxes on its own initiative without even going through the legislature. Last election a school levy was defeated over a similar provision that allowed the legislature to raise taxes without a referendum. I don't see people voting to give that power to a committee.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ColoradoCare backers coll...»Reply #7