Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: But if we enact single payer, your taxes will go up! [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)147. What you are describing is, by definition, not 'single' payer
a system in which a single public or quasi-public agency organizes health care financing, but the delivery of care remains largely in private hands. Under a single-payer system, all residents of the U.S. would be covered for all medically necessary services, including doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs.
http://www.pnhp.org/facts/what-is-single-payer
What is Single Payer?
Single-payer national health insurance, also known as Medicare for all, is a system in which a single public or quasi-public agency organizes health care financing, but the delivery of care remains largely in private hands. Under a single-payer system, all residents of the U.S. would be covered for all medically necessary services, including doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs.
The program would be funded by the savings obtained from replacing todays inefficient, profit-oriented, multiple insurance payers with a single streamlined, nonprofit, public payer, and by modest new taxes based on ability to pay. Premiums would disappear; 95 percent of all households would save money. Patients would no longer face financial barriers to care such as co-pays and deductibles, and would regain free choice of doctor and hospital. Doctors would regain autonomy over patient care.
The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act, H.R. 676, based on PNHPs JAMA-published Physicians Proposal, would establish an American single-payer health insurance system.
Single-payer national health insurance, also known as Medicare for all, is a system in which a single public or quasi-public agency organizes health care financing, but the delivery of care remains largely in private hands. Under a single-payer system, all residents of the U.S. would be covered for all medically necessary services, including doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs.
The program would be funded by the savings obtained from replacing todays inefficient, profit-oriented, multiple insurance payers with a single streamlined, nonprofit, public payer, and by modest new taxes based on ability to pay. Premiums would disappear; 95 percent of all households would save money. Patients would no longer face financial barriers to care such as co-pays and deductibles, and would regain free choice of doctor and hospital. Doctors would regain autonomy over patient care.
The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act, H.R. 676, based on PNHPs JAMA-published Physicians Proposal, would establish an American single-payer health insurance system.
http://www.pnhp.org/facts/what-is-single-payer
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
162 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The other question is "How did they live this long without being reminded to breathe?"
hobbit709
Oct 2015
#1
I've heard people discuss the VA hospitals re this issue and apparently they've got especially
Vinca
Oct 2015
#9
I'd like to see proof that Hilary belongs to a third way think tank. And not some Bernie
upaloopa
Oct 2015
#104
No, you can't move to Single Payer because in case you didn't notice we don't have the votes in
still_one
Oct 2015
#153
No it isn't. Making the insurance cartel too big to fail and legally cementing them as gatekeeper is
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#139
It's extremely easy to prove and the evidence is literally all over the world
kristopher
Oct 2015
#108
Your post might have been a bit ambiguous, but it was sickoftheonepct's post...
kristopher
Oct 2015
#113
Concept is right, but I doubt most people are paying $900/month premiums. (n/t)
thesquanderer
Oct 2015
#14
If taxes are aimed at the 1% as they should be then most wont have to pay much at all.
libtodeath
Oct 2015
#17
What about people who don't understand 'relevance', do they still get to post?
LanternWaste
Oct 2015
#64
Except that 30 million more people would be getting covered, which raises the costs
Recursion
Oct 2015
#132
the problem is those who get heath insurance as part of an employee bene package
dembotoz
Oct 2015
#45
Colorado has SP as a referendum for 2016. It will rely on a 10% payroll tax.
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#47
From what I read in a seperate article the state program can't override Medicare or VA health care.
RichVRichV
Oct 2015
#55
I wouldn't mind paying that to ensure everyone got healthcare but that isn't the real cost.
Live and Learn
Oct 2015
#98
The mandate now is 9.5%. Why is it perfectly acceptable for people that make way under 100k
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#141
I think that's the SP that the 1% are pushing for. Don't tax the 1% to cover the masses'
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#87
Bet it doesn't pass, people just can't grasp it would be cheaper and likely better care.
Hoyt
Oct 2015
#151
Exactly. Thank you. The simple answer is that the rich are so lacking in compassion that they would
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2015
#93
If ONLY there were some other, regular expense that would go away, which would offset that cost!
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2015
#99
WHY SHOULD THEY? There's more than enough from the "Defense" (WAR) budget to use.
WinkyDink
Oct 2015
#103
It would take either a 10% payroll levy and 10% corporate tax, or an 18% VAT
Recursion
Oct 2015
#133