Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ministers were told to destroy key evidence on eve of conflict which showed Iraq War was ILLEGAL [View all]bananas
(27,509 posts)12. That's why they dropped the case against Katherine Gun.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katharine_Gun
Katharine Teresa Gun (née Harwood, born 1974) is a British[1] former translator for the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), a British intelligence agency. In 2003, she became publicly known for leaking top-secret information to the press concerning illegal activities by the United States of America in their push for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Some of these activities include the US National Security Agency's eavesdropping operation on countries tasked with passing a second United Nations resolution on the invasion of Iraq.[2]
<snip>
The case came to court on 25 February 2004. Within half an hour, the case was dropped because the prosecution declined to offer evidence. The reasons for the prosecution dropping the case are unclear. The day before the trial, Gun's defence team had asked the government for any records of advice about the legality of the war that it had received during the run-up to the war. A full trial might have exposed any such documents to public scrutiny as the defence were expected to argue that trying to stop an illegal act (that of an illegal war of aggression) trumped Gun's obligations under the Official Secrets Act 1989. Speculation was rife in the media that the prosecution service had bowed to political pressure to drop the case so that any such documents would remain secret. However, a Government spokesman said that the decision to drop the case had been made before the defence's demands had been submitted. (The Guardian newspaper had reported plans to drop the case the previous week.[citation needed]) On the day of the court case, Gun was quoted as saying:
<snip>
Katharine Teresa Gun (née Harwood, born 1974) is a British[1] former translator for the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), a British intelligence agency. In 2003, she became publicly known for leaking top-secret information to the press concerning illegal activities by the United States of America in their push for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Some of these activities include the US National Security Agency's eavesdropping operation on countries tasked with passing a second United Nations resolution on the invasion of Iraq.[2]
<snip>
The case came to court on 25 February 2004. Within half an hour, the case was dropped because the prosecution declined to offer evidence. The reasons for the prosecution dropping the case are unclear. The day before the trial, Gun's defence team had asked the government for any records of advice about the legality of the war that it had received during the run-up to the war. A full trial might have exposed any such documents to public scrutiny as the defence were expected to argue that trying to stop an illegal act (that of an illegal war of aggression) trumped Gun's obligations under the Official Secrets Act 1989. Speculation was rife in the media that the prosecution service had bowed to political pressure to drop the case so that any such documents would remain secret. However, a Government spokesman said that the decision to drop the case had been made before the defence's demands had been submitted. (The Guardian newspaper had reported plans to drop the case the previous week.[citation needed]) On the day of the court case, Gun was quoted as saying:
I'm just baffled that in the 21st century we as human beings are still dropping bombs on each other as a means to resolve issues.
<snip>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
ministers were told to destroy key evidence on eve of conflict which showed Iraq War was ILLEGAL [View all]
malaise
Nov 2015
OP
I would prefer that Cheney live in Gitmo and Georgie be sentenced to flip burgers at Burger King
rhett o rick
Nov 2015
#21
You do make a good point in that Georgie would probably love flipping burgers.
rhett o rick
Nov 2015
#58
To quote Dr. Schuffhausen ("Dirty Rotten Scoundrels"): He needs something "a little more STRINGENT."
WinkyDink
Nov 2015
#30
Can we rent a nice place in Nuremberg? Must be large enough for some political trials?
L. Coyote
Nov 2015
#2
Imagine the fucking arrogance to know you are going to get millions of people killed, including
GoneFishin
Nov 2015
#6
I think not having any investigative journalism makes them bolder. If Harry Reasoner was calling
GoneFishin
Nov 2015
#13
Yep. But to perpetuate their dumbing down they will need to cork the internet. People need to be
GoneFishin
Nov 2015
#50
"For starters BLIAR should be expelled from Labour - then off to the Hague for this war criminal"
Betty Karlson
Nov 2015
#64