Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
1. Don't Know About Burkett But Rather & Co Made A Major Mistake On Those Documents.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 11:47 PM
Nov 2015

One glaring error surfaced with that situation. It was reported that the documents examine by the document examiner did NOT have originals. Using ANYTHING other than original documents is a loser. No credible forensic document examiner would ever issue an opinion based on COPIES.

I knew and met one of the best examiners in the country years ago. He never would even discuss a case with ORIGINAL documents. You simply cannot verify documents when there are no originals.

The flawed approach was was caused most of the problem. And if the documents had been shown to be fraudulent things might have turned out differently. Could have caused some real problems for Bush.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just saw the Mary Mapes/D...»Reply #1