Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
15. Exactly my point
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 05:52 PM
Nov 2015

I'm saying that being a Dem is not an automatic disqualifyer and there could even be something widely understood to be evidence. However, not all bigots join a club with criminal and hateful intentions.
I find micro-aggressions (and the refusal to admit and address them), vs outright criminal behaviors and endorsement pretty much equally contemptable. But, the direct results could be very different even if one enables the other.

I don't think that the consequences should be the same. The lines should not be manipulated or blurred as they were with the red scare, the way so many people of Middle Eastern descent have been treated since 9\11, and most relevant, the horrors that have been the results of assumptions that people of color live with daily.

I think I would find it satisfying to see actual KKK members face social, professional, legal penalties. But, I'm not so sure that setting up conditions which would leave room for errors and witch hunts is justifiable whether it is governmentally or privately driven.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A name appears on a list ...»Reply #15