Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
16. Excuse me, but 1.) This is my THEORY of what public education may be like in 15 - 20 years.
Sat May 26, 2012, 11:39 PM
May 2012

You're being overly defensive. Now get out of your feelings - I didn't say that I was in favor of the on-line system or that it was better than the current system. I'm just saying that money-wise and business-wise, I'm following the public education issue to its logical conclusion.

2.) The implementation of this on-line educational system is the reason that teachers and teachers' unions are under attack.

3.) No matter how much you try to belittle ME or on-line educations, you can't change the fact that on-line education is INCREDIBLY cost-efficient! It's smart business to at least try it this way for some of the students before implementing district/county/state-wide.

4.) You and the overpriced si-diddyfied advanced class that you teach will probably be the first class that your university makes available on-line. Why? Because your university can make more money video-taping your lectures for posterity and offering the course on-line.

If 200 people sign up for your advanced class, great! But if only 2 people want to sign up for your advanced class, the university can send you on an unpaid sabbatical, then press play on the video-taped lectures that you were required to make in advance to use with the lesson plan that you were required to turn in. Your university will still be able to afford to present the class to only 2 on-line students while you're not even there...............

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My theory is that most of the teachers won't even be replaced! TheDebbieDee May 2012 #1
The OP was meant to caution current teachers for the next phase without a job. CK_John May 2012 #3
Well, if my theory turns out to be right.......... TheDebbieDee May 2012 #5
I don't disagree with your theory, your just not taking to the OP. The current 40+ teacher will be CK_John May 2012 #7
question Dan May 2012 #11
The student would be allowed access to a lesson per a schedule...... TheDebbieDee May 2012 #14
how do you think Dan May 2012 #17
Well, in my model of how I think things might be set-up......... TheDebbieDee May 2012 #18
"already in effect at Devry University, University of Phoenix" GaYellowDawg May 2012 #13
Excuse me, but 1.) This is my THEORY of what public education may be like in 15 - 20 years. TheDebbieDee May 2012 #16
Ha! Didn't see this before now. GaYellowDawg Jun 2012 #21
I agree with you. I am seeing advertisements for a new elementary school like this woo me with science May 2012 #20
Yes. There seems to be nothing more dangerous Turbineguy May 2012 #2
I'm sure Mitt would say nothing personal just business. But if your 40+ CK_John May 2012 #4
It's about time teachers started to march Rosa Luxemburg May 2012 #6
After 20 yrs destroying the ed system, it may be too late. But... CK_John May 2012 #8
This summer is a good time to research age limits for some community jobs, like police, CK_John May 2012 #9
Meet RMoney's new education policy advisor IDemo May 2012 #10
Many people, regardless of their current job or career, over age 40 SheilaT May 2012 #12
i guess, there is one... Dan May 2012 #19
Teaching abroad, perhaps? aint_no_life_nowhere May 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Teachers over 40 need to ...»Reply #16