General Discussion

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)

15. It doesn't matter who it supports. Breitbart is a propaganda rag.

Fri Nov 6, 2015, 10:22 PM

Nov 2015

Breitbart is Infowars with lipstick and perfume.

There was a New York Times article that coveted this, as I recall. It was friendly to Clinton and the release today that there was no classified information in her emails takes the edge from the story. But the Times is a more reputable source.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Jeffersons Ghost Nov 2015 OP

Breitbart? Isn't he taking a dirt nap? nt msanthrope Nov 2015 #1

I'm not one to normally whine about sources - the content is what's important... Maedhros Nov 2015 #2

I found a similar article at Fox News... Jeffersons Ghost Nov 2015 #8

The other way to spell "Breitbart" is "Bullshit" emulatorloo Nov 2015 #3

Breitbart makes shit up. It is Republican propaganda. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #4

I had no idea this source was questionable and why are you attacking a post that supports Clinton? Jeffersons Ghost Nov 2015 #9

WTF! How could you be a member of DU and NOT know that Laurian Nov 2015 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Electric Monk Nov 2015 #14

It doesn't matter who it supports. Breitbart is a propaganda rag. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #15

Go away troll ronnykmarshall Nov 2015 #5

Subject doesn't match the story jberryhill Nov 2015 #6

read the link yourself Jeffersons Ghost Nov 2015 #10

Breitbart? lamp_shade Nov 2015 #7

Thnks for letting me know this source is questionable Jeffersons Ghost Nov 2015 #12

You better self-delete. nt geek tragedy Nov 2015 #13

I will and then repost from another source since we cannot focus on content Jeffersons Ghost Nov 2015 #16