Analysis Of Kentucky Election Results Indicates Fraud

[Stevepol]

61. I don't understand what to heck you're talking about.

I've used statistical methods in a number of classes. By analyzing the results of an election and noting that the pattern of the voting results are different from the pattern of results we would expect seems to me to be highly logical and based on common sense. It has nothing to do with the way a program is used and changed by subsequent programs or alterations to the existing program. What bias has any of the statisticians "introduced" by looking at the patterns and distributions of the votes? What bias have they introduced by looking at the anomalies between the pre-election polls and the final results or the anomalies between the expected vote in urban versus rural precincts. This seems to be Common Sense 101 and has nothing whatever to do with the particular configuration of the programs that created the anomalies. There are a thousand ways to rig an election. Figuring out that the election was most likely rigged or compromised and using common sense methods to find out what the vote actually was is quite straightforward. Get the paper. Hope that the paper has not been tampered with. Then HAND-COUNT THE PAPER BALLOTS in a transparent and open way. If the vote count was wrong, try to determine how the scam was managed and who did it and send the guys to jail as the 8 guys from Clay County KY were sent to jail for rigging and altering the machines over a decades long period to assure that Repubs stayed in charge in Clay County.