Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Third Wayers are better than most Republicans [View all]Scuba
(53,475 posts)40. Also, don't forget that Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ....
http://www.salon.com/2001/06/28/telecom_dereg/
In his remarks that day Clinton boasted that the landmark legislation fulfills my administrations promise to reform our telecommunications laws in a manner that leads to competition and private investment, promotes universal service and provides for flexible government regulation.
Five years later nobody doubts that the law was indeed a landmark not only because congressional efforts to update the countrys vast communications industries for the first time since the 1930s had themselves dragged on through the 80s and well into the 90s but also because the Telecom Act, as it became known, unleashed unprecedented deregulation and media consolidation, among the most pronounced in American history. Nowhere has that consolidation been more acutely felt than in radio where just two companies, Clear Channel and Infinity, now dominate the nations commercial radio stations. The result, many longtime radio industry observers feel, has been the degradation of commercial radio as a creative, independent medium.
...
In late 1995, when the Telecom Act was being assembled, it was most often portrayed by its backers as a way to allow Baby Bell phone companies to get into the long-distance business, promote competition, introduce the V-chip to parents, police Internet porn and deregulate cable rates. Indeed, the Telecom Acts laundry list of initiatives covered nearly 200 pages of legislation. Down toward the bottom of that list, though, was a provision, one that received very little public attention (Clinton never even mentioned it during his extended remarks at the bill signing), that lifted all ownership limits for radio station broadcasters nationwide and allowed them to operate as many as eight signals in the countrys largest markets.
To describe the new laws sweeping implications for radio as radical would be an understatement. Prior to this law, tightly regulated broadcasters could own just 40 stations nationally, and only two in a given market. Years earlier, those limits had been relaxed, very cautiously, by the Federal Communications Commission. But suddenly, without the FCCs input or any public hearings, the kind of sweeping deregulation that most broadcasters hadnt even fantasized about two years earlier was ushered in overnight.
Five years later nobody doubts that the law was indeed a landmark not only because congressional efforts to update the countrys vast communications industries for the first time since the 1930s had themselves dragged on through the 80s and well into the 90s but also because the Telecom Act, as it became known, unleashed unprecedented deregulation and media consolidation, among the most pronounced in American history. Nowhere has that consolidation been more acutely felt than in radio where just two companies, Clear Channel and Infinity, now dominate the nations commercial radio stations. The result, many longtime radio industry observers feel, has been the degradation of commercial radio as a creative, independent medium.
...
In late 1995, when the Telecom Act was being assembled, it was most often portrayed by its backers as a way to allow Baby Bell phone companies to get into the long-distance business, promote competition, introduce the V-chip to parents, police Internet porn and deregulate cable rates. Indeed, the Telecom Acts laundry list of initiatives covered nearly 200 pages of legislation. Down toward the bottom of that list, though, was a provision, one that received very little public attention (Clinton never even mentioned it during his extended remarks at the bill signing), that lifted all ownership limits for radio station broadcasters nationwide and allowed them to operate as many as eight signals in the countrys largest markets.
To describe the new laws sweeping implications for radio as radical would be an understatement. Prior to this law, tightly regulated broadcasters could own just 40 stations nationally, and only two in a given market. Years earlier, those limits had been relaxed, very cautiously, by the Federal Communications Commission. But suddenly, without the FCCs input or any public hearings, the kind of sweeping deregulation that most broadcasters hadnt even fantasized about two years earlier was ushered in overnight.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Third way will at least toss us the bone, the Republicans throw it away instead of tossing it to us.
LiberalArkie
Nov 2015
#5
That President Bill Clinton (D) was worse than Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bush Sr.? Really?
DJ13
Nov 2015
#15
Amped up hyperbolic attack on 99% of Dems! And now we will both be alerted on, LOL.
bettyellen
Nov 2015
#8
Broad support from the narrow (and greedy) minds of the beltway are no indication of a good idea
Hydra
Nov 2015
#25
Also, don't forget that Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ....
Scuba
Nov 2015
#40
If you're talking about people so hateful they wish McCain/Palin had won in 2008, you are right
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#52
I think you're soft-pedaling, inadvertently, just how extreme Reaganism and Thatcherism
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#65
True enough. 3rd Wayers aren't known for juice -- except when attacking progressives.
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#44
We don't need a think tank of investment bankers ruining the country anymore than they already
Rex
Nov 2015
#41
Shorter OP: Most Democrats are moral monsters, only the pure are virtuous nt
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#47
Bernie was my first choice even when people were debasing themselves by begging Elizabeth
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#51
Shades of Moe Szyslak: "Well, I'm better than dirt! Well... most kinds of dirt."
Romulox
Nov 2015
#67
Trust me, I'm Canis familiaris, says the feral dog running with the coyotes...
HereSince1628
Nov 2015
#71
I think third wayers are liars and deceivers are any of them running as conservatives? But their
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#84