General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson destroys argument for intelligent design [View all]fasttense
(17,301 posts)Just checking to see how far down into creationism you go. There are very many people here in the South who claim the ID argument but then quote scripture to prove the earth is less than 10,000 years old. The believers of ID in the south are mostly smarter creationists.
You are stuck on what created the big bang. You are also obviously stuck at the non living matter into a one cell organism stage too. And You don't know how Chromosomes evolved. How is that any kind of proof? Sort like the missing link hypothesis.
The missing link hypothesis is: Since we don't know all the links in the chain of the creation of man or the universe, we claim a God did it. Which is kind of a silly argument because you have yet to provide any evidence of this God. You need to give some evidence based in the real world of this God. How about an experiment that proves it? Take your hypothesis to a logical test or experiment.
There is plenty of evidence in the evolution of life and the universe. True we don't have all the links but the evidence for evolution and natural selection is in numerous, very well written scientific books that provide boundless evidence in the physical world.
Why is life too complex to be natural selection? Many very complex structures have occurred because of the laws of physics interacting with the elements of the universe. Given enough time, many beautiful complex and amazing things evolve. All that's needed is time and matter.
Your best logical argument for a creator (NOT Intelligent Design) Is that once you have found what started the Big Bang, you will have to find out what caused that and then what caused the cause of the big bang and on and on. Nothing in the Universe lasts forever and has always been, so there has to be a beginning. That beginning could be a God but I have no evidence of that.