General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson destroys argument for intelligent design [View all]robersl
(83 posts)I was being sarcastic. I believe you are anthropomorphizing evolution when you posit a prion in a libid bilayer that jumps to a living organism.
Regarding the bad design of humans, wow. I haven't addressed that because it seems too incredible that you would say that. You are sitting at a computer communicating with me. You are typing, but you can't tell me how. You are formulating thoughts, but you have no clue as to how you do that either.
You don't speak a sentence internally before it comes out of your mouth, you just start talking - yet the right words show up by the end of the sentence. You don't know why.
An outfielder will hear the crack of a bat and see a half second of trajectory, and will proceed to the right spot at the right time to make the catch. You have no clue how that happens either.
By what standards to you judge that you call the human badly designed?
Science minded people have successfully dismissed the medieval concept of God and think they have solved the problem. But science has no real clue as to how life started or how it works.
What is incredible to me is the single-minded determination to dismiss the possibility of an intelligent source for the universe. Why is that so important to do? It doesn't negate anything that science is pursuing. Amazing....