General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson destroys argument for intelligent design [View all]fasttense
(17,301 posts)There is absolutely no physical evidence of the existence of God. There I proved God does NOT exist.
Now your turn give me some evidence he does exist.
Today, I may not be able to tell you how the Big Bang started. But tomorrow, or 20 years from now, I may be able to. And it will have nothing to do with God. Don't you think people said the same thing before the big bang was hypothesized? You can't prove how the earth and stars were created therefore there is a God. You can't prove why the sun rises and sets every day so there must be a God. You don't know why my friend died, so there must be a God. Every time science comes up with a blank does not mean there is a God. It just means there is more research needed.
Occam's razor is NOT evidence. It is merely a problem solving principle which states: "Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected."
My assumption is that 1.)eventually science will be able to explain how the big bang got started. 2.) God will have nothing to do with it.
Your assumptions:1.) There is an all powerful being that is 2.)always living outside our space and time and 3.)super intelligent. 4.)This being with all these powers decided to start our universe 5.) with a big bang (You would think a powerful being would find a quicker less gangling way of creating a universe - at least he could have done it with less noise). 6.)Since then he has left no evidence of his existence.