General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson destroys argument for intelligent design [View all]OxQQme
(2,550 posts)How about Zechariah Sitchin's findings from the wayback ---> http://www.mars-earth.com/sitchintext.htm
In his first book he describes, based on 'his' readings of the ancient tablets uncovered by archaeologists over the recently passed centuries, that this planet that we exist upon had been struck by a moon of a passing populated planet several billion years ago.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/46857919/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/moons-makeup-may-be-more-earths-thought/
And tablets that described that this planet is the seventh rock 'in' from 'out there. Visually depicted in clay.
And that Innana was the head honcho amongst her homeys (Annanuki/Nephilim) and a matriarchal led society was extant for an "age" (measured in planetary pole wobble). How could those early post-flood humans KNOW of this?
And the 'gods and goddesses' made physical appearances every few human generations. Hence all the temples.
And why there were two Bronze Ages.
And delineating the planet using sexidecimal geometry. (circle measurement)
And all of earth's most holy sites being placed right on the 30th parallel.
And the creation of adamu.
All lost due to "religion' believing in one God.
Which, historically, is a recent belief.
I believe we have been fostered by a higher intelligence.
Star dust.
The anthropologist E. T. Hall, in Beyond Culture, put it this way: Everything man is and does is modified by learning and is therefore malleable. But once learned, these behavior patterns, these habitual responses, these ways of interacting gradually sink below the surface of the mind and, like the admiral of a submerged submarine fleet, control from the depths. The hidden controls are usually experienced as though they were innate simply because they are not only ubiquitous but habitual as well.