Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Am I the only one thinking the best response to the Paris attacks is an intelligence response? [View all]gordyfl
(598 posts)36. Kudos to All on This Thread
I thought these were all great posts on this thread. A lot of independent thinkers who don't allow the media pundits and politicians do their thinking for them.
War is a serious matter. Bombing is war, even if you define it as Special Operations, Providing Air Support, whatever. Before any country bombs another country ALL the consequences and repercussions should be considered. The U.S., Russia, France, Great Britain have participated in creating quagmires in the Middle East, and surrounding areas. All for what? Is it really worth it?
I heard Bernie Sanders say in the first debate that Russia would be caught in a quagmire in Syria. I heard some moans coming from the audience. Not many, but some. This was before the Russian airliner was blown up.
I think our leaders should think, think, think before getting us involved in wars around the world.
I believe we should focus on building and repairing bridges here at home, instead of destroying bridges around the world.
War is a serious matter. Bombing is war, even if you define it as Special Operations, Providing Air Support, whatever. Before any country bombs another country ALL the consequences and repercussions should be considered. The U.S., Russia, France, Great Britain have participated in creating quagmires in the Middle East, and surrounding areas. All for what? Is it really worth it?
I heard Bernie Sanders say in the first debate that Russia would be caught in a quagmire in Syria. I heard some moans coming from the audience. Not many, but some. This was before the Russian airliner was blown up.
I think our leaders should think, think, think before getting us involved in wars around the world.
I believe we should focus on building and repairing bridges here at home, instead of destroying bridges around the world.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Am I the only one thinking the best response to the Paris attacks is an intelligence response? [View all]
backscatter712
Nov 2015
OP
new ones will just step in: we only have delusions of omnipotence, not actual power
MisterP
Nov 2015
#4
Agree. Osama Bin Laden tried and convicted, sentenced to life in prison would have been better
peacebird
Nov 2015
#27
yeah, there's nothing wrong with ISIS that a few hugs and gift baskets won't fix nt
geek tragedy
Nov 2015
#40
I picture an elite force with full access to local records. They would NOT be a hit team....
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#59
I agree. Send Bush, Cheney, Blair, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al to the Hague for war crimes tribunal.
peacebird
Nov 2015
#28
"Where was this response when Bush was killing thousands of Iraqi innocents?"
oberliner
Nov 2015
#26
We were called traitors and worse for marching against the war. We knew what was coming w IWR
peacebird
Nov 2015
#29
Well, unlike trolls on the WWW you cannot just ignore ISIS. Seems to make the problem worse.
Rex
Nov 2015
#48
No, you are not. Better and more intense intelligence-gathering will help...
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#50
Well, that's a given. Anytime any member of Daesh is identified, kill him.
backscatter712
Nov 2015
#51