Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(16,477 posts)

5. Not sure why you come to that conclusion.

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:28 PM

Nov 2015

They are called in after an attack or to break a hostage situation. They are not charged with intelligence gathering to prevent attacks.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The worst mistake the terrorists in Paris made: Hitting France in the first place [View all] jmowreader Nov 2015 OP

Not sure why you come to that conclusion. NutmegYankee Nov 2015 #5

Might those be the no-nonsense types in uniforms hifiguy Nov 2015 #2

Yup. Same guys. jmowreader Nov 2015 #3

I just reposted it in full hifiguy Nov 2015 #4

You know we are going to need a link, right? awoke_in_2003 Nov 2015 #6

Google democratic underground: polar bear reindeer hifiguy Nov 2015 #9

Cool, thanks. nt awoke_in_2003 Nov 2015 #11

I saw a group of them when I was in Paris last year, took a pic. Avalux Nov 2015 #7

I said that same thing earlier. davsand Nov 2015 #8

Well I hope these 'interrogation methods' are lawful philosslayer Nov 2015 #14

Apart from the US and in a very limited sense the IDF alcibiades_mystery Nov 2015 #10

This reporter spent a year with GIGN Ex Lurker Nov 2015 #12

That's friggin' awesome. lovemydog Nov 2015 #15

With all due respect, I must correct some point in the OP and answers Yorktown Nov 2015 #13