Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A very revealing article about the libertarian take over of the Democratic [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)7. I read the OP not as a libertarian takeover, but a tech/big city/urban professional takeover
of the party.
As an example of their growing power, California was once Ronald Reagan territory; but now, the Democratic leadership has taken over big cities, as their base in manufacturing union towns dwindles (think of House Leader Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco, Hillary Clinton from New York, and Barack Obama from Chicago).
On nearly every major battle within the Democratic Party (high skilled immigration, Syrian military intervention, Keystone XL pipeline, and charter schools) education is the dividing line between the capitalism-loving-global-citizen Democrats and regulation-happy-America-first Democrats.
Unlike their capitalism-loving libertarian counterparts, these tech Democrats aren't rabid individualists. They want the government to encourage everyone to maximize their contribution to society by competitively funding citizens to be as educated, entrepreneurial, healthy, and civic as possible.
Traditionally, each political party had had their fear-of-change coalition. Conservatives feared cultural disruption while liberals feared economic disruption. ... That is, psychologically, the same need for certainty that predicts anti-gay attitudes in conservatives also predicts support for wage laws and regulation in liberalsblockquote]
On each of the issues in the graphic, Democrats differ but not dramatically. On 'decreasing Asian immigration' a majority opposes it. On 'free trade is good for Americans' the difference is only 6%, right around 50%). On 'public services should compete', again a majority opposes it. On the Keystone Pipeline, leaders of the party have not supported it, although some unions did.
There are certainly changes in the makeup of the party. If tech and urban professionals had migrated to the republican party, I doubt our party would be stronger today. There always have been changes in the makeup of the party and always will be.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A very revealing article about the libertarian take over of the Democratic [View all]
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
OP
It is depressing and they stayed so well hidden it took me too long to find them. I am glad they
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#18
now, it's not all seasteading freaks--but the DLC was founded to ensure that the party had a steady
MisterP
Nov 2015
#6
That story is part of the DLC official and authorized history...you really believe all that?
HereSince1628
Nov 2015
#13
That is more deception and it is called "spin" by some and these folks are libertarian liars, none
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#20
I read the OP not as a libertarian takeover, but a tech/big city/urban professional takeover
pampango
Nov 2015
#7
I agree. "Libertarian" might not be exactly the right word for it. Anti-worker is better. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2015
#27
libertarians are only that untill they are out of work, then suddenly they are first in line for
Javaman
Nov 2015
#17
False equivalency and spin. True the Democrataic once had Dixie Crats and Anti-War, pro and anti
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#22
So according to you inflitering the Democratic party on liberal social issues and hiding their
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#30
Because you are the same folks pushing "both parties are the same" because you want one party only.
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#32
I was responding to your comment, "why did any of us choose to inflitrate the . . . . and thought it
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#41
It is only my opinion, but you sounded like what a conservative defines as a liberal. I don't know
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#45
Lots of people are abandoning the crazy train that is the republicans right now.
FLPanhandle
Nov 2015
#25
Affordable schools that will have no tax support. How are schools going to be affordable with no
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#33
In a way, this doesn't surprise me. The draw bridge is down & the guards are drunk...
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#28
I agree and the few liberal Democratic still around are going to have to do a lot of shouting and
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#34
Awesome, I'll go find it at Unabridged Bookstore in Lakeview, Chicago
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Nov 2015
#42
Thanks. You reminded men about an earlier crazy scheme, job sharing, the ninties I think.
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#43
blockquote]