Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
13. That story is part of the DLC official and authorized history...you really believe all that?
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 09:16 AM
Nov 2015

The DLC was created to turn southern economic gains into political gains that would mostly serve southern politicians.

That economically based political gain was rooted in policies and practices that had encouraged manufacturing to 'go south', and which by their very nature depended on politically friendliness to corporations and vice versa.

The DLC mostly took advantage of what already existed. They simply pushed the inflation of it from regional party policy to national party policy. And it didn't work so well nationally because the economics were dependent upon between-region economic and political asymmetries that weren't uniformly favorable across the nation.

The exploitation of the asymmetrical economic advantage of taking an industry south which began in the late 50's was almost over when the DLC rode into politics on the glory of the economic rise of the south.. At the time the DLC arose, American industry was already actively looking to create manufacturing colonies outside the country. The big successes of foreign auto and electronics manufacturers having opened their eyes.

Soon after the formal introduction of the DLC, it was very apparent to corporations that the greater asymmetries that would provide much greater profit opportunities were international. Jobs quit going south, they began seriously moving outside US borders. By the end of the Clinton administration, the DLC was deep into the rhetoric and policies of 'globalization'.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's part of the GOP meltdown + Dem leaders chasing the money Hydra Nov 2015 #1
Let's damp down the anxiety with a quick little point. Hortensis Nov 2015 #24
Hillary has embraced them? Not nearly as much as Bernie. n/t pnwmom Nov 2015 #2
Do tell, pnwmom Scootaloo Nov 2015 #5
Wait, I thought he was too far left Goblinmonger Nov 2015 #10
please explain. nt Javaman Nov 2015 #16
Your belief is that Bernie is pushing for more H1B visas? n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #26
What the hell are you smoking? hifiguy Nov 2015 #40
By "revealing" I think you meant "depressing". n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author TumbleAndJumble Nov 2015 #4
It is depressing and they stayed so well hidden it took me too long to find them. I am glad they Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #18
now, it's not all seasteading freaks--but the DLC was founded to ensure that the party had a steady MisterP Nov 2015 #6
That story is part of the DLC official and authorized history...you really believe all that? HereSince1628 Nov 2015 #13
That is more deception and it is called "spin" by some and these folks are libertarian liars, none Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #20
I read the OP not as a libertarian takeover, but a tech/big city/urban professional takeover pampango Nov 2015 #7
I agree. "Libertarian" might not be exactly the right word for it. Anti-worker is better. n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #27
That's not Libertarian. It is crony capitalism n2doc Nov 2015 #8
You got it. Thanks! n/t djean111 Nov 2015 #9
Perfect. GoneFishin Nov 2015 #11
...! KoKo Nov 2015 #12
Yep. A kinder, gentler & more "progressive" fascism. nt raouldukelives Nov 2015 #15
That "kindness" will only last until they gain power. Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #19
What a crock. Darb Nov 2015 #14
libertarians are only that untill they are out of work, then suddenly they are first in line for Javaman Nov 2015 #17
The Democratic Party has always had many factions, Hortensis Nov 2015 #21
False equivalency and spin. True the Democrataic once had Dixie Crats and Anti-War, pro and anti Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #22
Spin? Yes. Let's CAN that, shall we? It's not correct that Hortensis Nov 2015 #23
So according to you inflitering the Democratic party on liberal social issues and hiding their Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #30
Why did any of us choose to "infiltrate" the Democratic Party? Hortensis Nov 2015 #31
Because you are the same folks pushing "both parties are the same" because you want one party only. Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #32
"You"? You are mistaken, Illusion. I am a lifelong Hortensis Nov 2015 #36
I was responding to your comment, "why did any of us choose to inflitrate the . . . . and thought it Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #41
Brawl away, then. I think I sounded like a liberal. Hortensis Nov 2015 #44
It is only my opinion, but you sounded like what a conservative defines as a liberal. I don't know Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #45
Lots of people are abandoning the crazy train that is the republicans right now. FLPanhandle Nov 2015 #25
Affordable schools that will have no tax support. How are schools going to be affordable with no Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #33
But they love and worship hifiguy Nov 2015 #38
In a way, this doesn't surprise me. The draw bridge is down & the guards are drunk... Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #28
I've been posting about democrats unwittingly espousing WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2015 #29
I agree and the few liberal Democratic still around are going to have to do a lot of shouting and Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #34
Have you read "The Internet Is Not the Answer" by Andrew Keen? FSogol Nov 2015 #39
Awesome, I'll go find it at Unabridged Bookstore in Lakeview, Chicago WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2015 #42
Thanks. You reminded men about an earlier crazy scheme, job sharing, the ninties I think. Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #43
This battle has already been joined in $iliValley KamaAina Nov 2015 #35
Repubs who can't abide the jebus-wheezers and xenophobes hifiguy Nov 2015 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A very revealing article ...»Reply #13