Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)

1. "That could only be changed by a constitutional amendment..."

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:56 PM

Nov 2015

A long article stating the obvious. If you want to remove First Amendment protection from political speech intended to influence elections, a constitutional amendment is indeed necessary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Martin Frost and Tom Davis: An idea for fixing campaign finance [View all] Omaha Steve Nov 2015 OP

"That could only be changed by a constitutional amendment..." Nye Bevan Nov 2015 #1

I stopped reading at brucefan Nov 2015 #2

Tom was my supervisor on the Fairfax County Board and later ... 11 Bravo Nov 2015 #3