Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kaleva

(40,299 posts)
23. Actually one can be.
Sun May 27, 2012, 10:45 PM
May 2012

"Most executive orders are issued under specific statutory authority from Congress and have the force and effect of law. Such executive orders usually impose sanctions, determine legal rights, limit agency discretion, and require immediate compliance. Federal courts consider such orders to be the equivalent of federal statutes. In addition, regulations that are enacted to carry out these executive orders have the status of law as long as they reasonably relate to the statutory authority. An administrative action that is carried out under a valid executive order is similar to an agency action that is carried out under a federal statute. In each case, the agency's authority to enact rules and to issue orders comes from Congress.

Absent specific statutory authority, an executive order may have the force and effect of law if Congress has acquiesced in a long-standing executive practice that is well-known to it...."

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Executive+Order

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you mean we back his assassination? CaliforniaPeggy May 2012 #1
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #3
You do realize that the U.S. forces assassinating foreign leaders is a violation of federal law and coalition_unwilling May 2012 #4
It is an Executive Order, not Federal Law ProgressiveProfessor May 2012 #9
I was not aware of the distinction prior to today and I thank coalition_unwilling May 2012 #12
+1. Smells like FR. freshwest May 2012 #24
Actually one can be. Kaleva May 2012 #23
That is a wonderful link you provided--thank you for it. MADem May 2012 #27
Then perhaps you should carry it out yourself. sibelian May 2012 #8
On what basis do you make the claim that Assad will be dead in 10 days? Trajan May 2012 #2
He's hoping Scootaloo May 2012 #5
From at least 2008, this poster has stated as fait accomplis karynnj May 2012 #6
deleted tabatha May 2012 #7
Another fair accompli prediction CreekDog May 2012 #10
We will see in ten days - I personally doubt that. David__77 May 2012 #11
I agree. Assassinating Assad will almost certainly provoke even more of a bloodbath riderinthestorm May 2012 #13
Thankfully, NATO and the US will not intervene militarily - directly. David__77 May 2012 #14
Nonsense. tabatha May 2012 #16
You think Obama IS foolish enough? David__77 May 2012 #18
I am staggered that you do not understand that the only person committing tabatha May 2012 #15
Sorry Tabatha but I firmly disagree. There's blood on both sides. riderinthestorm May 2012 #26
Is that ten business days? GreatCaesarsGhost May 2012 #17
:) pinboy3niner May 2012 #19
CK_John has NEVER posted anything that has EVER come true scheming daemons May 2012 #20
You mean McCain never dropped out of the '08 race... Iggo May 2012 #25
Exactly. What was Bugs Bunny's catch phrase again? FSogol May 2012 #28
Unrec brooklynite May 2012 #21
My sources say he has eleven days DavidDvorkin May 2012 #22
Let's count. Today marks one day since that prediction was made. DavidDvorkin May 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Assad has less than 10 da...»Reply #23