Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
15. his party and ideology was not started in order to spread Christianity
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 06:22 AM
Nov 2015

and the idea that Nazism pro-religion has been debunked by way to many serious historians time and time again.

Hitler's public relationship to religion has been characterized as one of opportunistic pragmatism.[10] His regime did not publicly advocate for state atheism, but it did seek to reduce the influence of Christianity on society. Hitler himself was reluctant to make public attacks on the Church for political reasons, despite the urgings of Nazis like Bormann. Although he was skeptical of religion,[11][12] he did not present himself to the public as an atheist, and spoke of belief in an "almighty creator".[13][14] In private, he could be ambiguous.[15][16] Evans wrote that Hitler repeatedly stated that Nazism was a secular ideology founded on science, which in the long run could not "co-exist with religion".[17]...In office, the Hitler regime connived at a Kirchenkampf (lit. church struggle). While wary of open conflict with the churches, Hitler generally permitted or encouraged anti-church radicals such as Himmler, Goebbels and Bormann to perpetrate their persecutions of the churches.[26] According to Evans, by 1939, 95% of Germans still called themselves Protestant or Catholic, with 3.5% 'Deist' (gottgläubig) and 1.5% atheist—most in these latter categories being "convinced Nazis who had left their Church at the behest of the Party, which had been trying since the mid-1930s to reduce the influence of Christianity in society".[27] Gottgläubig" (lit. "believers in God&quot , had a non-denominational, nazified outlook on divine beliefs, often described as predominantly based on creationist and deistic views.[28] Despite all the promotion for positive Christianity and thegottgläubig movement, the majority of the three million Nazi Party members continued to pay their church taxes and register as either Roman Catholic or mainline Protestant Christians.[29] Hitler angered the churches by appointing the neo-pagan Alfred Rosenberg as official Nazi ideologist.


even the pictures you show merely depict political opportunism of him being acceptable to things that came before him, before he started oppressing the churches.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Of course it would, but fat chance of that... TreasonousBastard Nov 2015 #1
Should we stop discussing whether Christianity is peaceful? Warpy Nov 2015 #2
+ a bazillion inanna Nov 2015 #4
yes,i agree with all religions. we see it on DU also when someone says "he isn't a real christian" JI7 Nov 2015 #9
It seems that far too many people have never heard of hifiguy Nov 2015 #62
Thank you. Blue_In_AK Nov 2015 #10
Thanks from me too! eom BlueMTexpat Nov 2015 #20
We should start. Both Islam and Christianity are proselytizing Hortensis Nov 2015 #23
+1 ejbr Nov 2015 #24
I agree! haikugal Nov 2015 #76
I know plenty of peaceful Muslims. MADem Nov 2015 #3
while I agree to beware of a broad brush ericson00 Nov 2015 #5
Christians have done a fine job of racking up the body count too. nt MADem Nov 2015 #6
this isn't about what religion individuals happen to be. ericson00 Nov 2015 #7
You seriously don't think that Christianity has been used as MADem Nov 2015 #11
his party and ideology was not started in order to spread Christianity ericson00 Nov 2015 #15
Opportunistic pragmatism. Why are you so insular that you suppose MADem Nov 2015 #50
Ahem.... Nye Bevan Nov 2015 #47
+5000000 ericson00 Nov 2015 #51
Thank you for proving my point. MADem Nov 2015 #53
yes, but that's what i mean. there are good/bad people in all religions JI7 Nov 2015 #8
I am agreeing with you and riffing on your thesis. nt MADem Nov 2015 #12
Wait a minute. You know a bunch of Muslims who don't live according to the religion's rules, Marr Nov 2015 #71
Of course they are--just like the "real" Catholics with two kids. MADem Nov 2015 #73
Islam subjugates women and persecutes gay people. Tipperary Nov 2015 #13
well said! ericson00 Nov 2015 #14
If you are BlueMTexpat Nov 2015 #21
Well that freedom should be for all individuals, not just straight men of the dominate faith group Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #30
I am a bit confused by your answer. BlueMTexpat Nov 2015 #63
It's not just the fanatics who subjugate women and persecute gays. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2015 #40
I lived for eight years BlueMTexpat Nov 2015 #57
There will be others coming leftynyc Nov 2015 #16
While I bellieve all all religous extremists to be a bad influence, Snobblevitch Nov 2015 #17
I like Maher leftynyc Nov 2015 #18
Its good to be back ericson00 Nov 2015 #19
I'm not against Islam leftynyc Nov 2015 #28
I'm with you. I'm against the demagogues from the GOP's side ericson00 Nov 2015 #31
That's a very good piece leftynyc Nov 2015 #34
I read the article and it was very good Jim Beard Nov 2015 #52
The US has much stricter leftynyc Nov 2015 #58
Its sad to say that our country has ALMOST always been horrible to refugees or immigrants Jim Beard Nov 2015 #69
We definitely have our leftynyc Nov 2015 #74
Which country doesn't have its darker history? TexasMommaWithAHat Nov 2015 #82
100% True leftynyc Nov 2015 #90
You mean the Syrians were acting like Americans on Black Friday though snagglepuss Nov 2015 #78
They are choosing the wrong people to support. Jim Beard Nov 2015 #84
+1000 smirkymonkey Nov 2015 #87
Go back a thousand years. trotsky Nov 2015 #25
I don't deny the PAST leftynyc Nov 2015 #29
I'm concerned about the past. As we all should be. We have to learn from it. trotsky Nov 2015 #33
Spare me the drama leftynyc Nov 2015 #35
Drama? Because you don't want anyone to discuss the violent past of your religion? trotsky Nov 2015 #36
I'm not a Christian leftynyc Nov 2015 #38
The reality of the problem is that many religions - not just Islam - have violence in their texts. trotsky Nov 2015 #39
Violence in books is one thing leftynyc Nov 2015 #42
Yet those religions have done the same in the past... trotsky Nov 2015 #43
So you must have link leftynyc Nov 2015 #44
Take off the blinders. Open your eyes. trotsky Nov 2015 #56
If you think comparing leftynyc Nov 2015 #59
What's stopping them then? Throd Nov 2015 #45
That's simple atreides1 Nov 2015 #54
If they really believed that strongly they would just go do it. Martyrdom for the cause. Throd Nov 2015 #60
Secular governments, enlightenment thinking. trotsky Nov 2015 #55
Give it up. Your argument is pointless. The past is no longer relevant when discussing smirkymonkey Nov 2015 #88
Its not religeon, its Thugs> Jim Beard Nov 2015 #86
"came of age" melman Nov 2015 #48
I'm just glad that Christianity doesn't subjugate women and persecute gay people Android3.14 Nov 2015 #22
Ask yourself a very simple question leftynyc Nov 2015 #46
"West or in an Islamic country" is Apples and oranges Android3.14 Nov 2015 #64
No, not really leftynyc Nov 2015 #72
Yes, really - Mali, Jordan, Turkey, Indonesia and Albania Android3.14 Nov 2015 #75
that doesn't make them all terrorists treestar Nov 2015 #79
can we still talk about "Islamic governments"? alc Nov 2015 #26
I agree get the red out Nov 2015 #27
Islam is not progressive FLPanhandle Nov 2015 #32
Bra-fcking-vo! hifiguy Nov 2015 #65
But some on DU see it as anti-Western, so it gets a pass. Throd Nov 2015 #66
hopefully, not anymore ericson00 Nov 2015 #83
But some on DU see it as anti-Western, so it gets a pass. Throd Nov 2015 #66
But some on DU see it as anti-Western, so it gets a pass. Throd Nov 2015 #67
Yes please. nt redwitch Nov 2015 #37
I imagine the inherent peace or violence of a thing is predicated on interpretation. LanternWaste Nov 2015 #41
Yes, because of course some Muslims are and some are not. But it's better to discuss agendas Yo_Mama Nov 2015 #49
None of the Abrahamic fairy tales is about peace. Period. hifiguy Nov 2015 #61
It's a free country. You can do or not do whatever you want. closeupready Nov 2015 #70
Islam is no more violent than Christianity. TIME TO PANIC Nov 2015 #77
"ISIL is not Islamic. No religion condones the killing of innocents." - Barack Obama mwrguy Nov 2015 #80
Well, if the President said it, it must be true. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2015 #81
That simply isn't true. Marr Nov 2015 #85
Most Christians don't give as much weight to the TexasMommaWithAHat Nov 2015 #89
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should we Stop Discussing...»Reply #15