General Discussion

Jarqui

(10,905 posts)

10. Bush: Truly not concerned about bin Laden

Thu Nov 19, 2015, 10:52 AM

Nov 2015

I realize there are differences in the situations but that attitude about getting bin Laden didn't exactly endear him to some folks after going to war and things he previously said, etc

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

so france, within days, kills the attack mastermind without invading any countries, [View all] restorefreedom Nov 2015 OP

Little harder to grab Osama than the twerp they just killed. trumad Nov 2015 #1

Yep. Osama wasn't sitting around in NYC after 9/11 FLPanhandle Nov 2015 #2

+1 treestar Nov 2015 #5

True, but Osama awoke_in_2003 Nov 2015 #53

just a slight understatement, lol. BootinUp Nov 2015 #55

Apples and oranges, but whatever... Blue_Tires Nov 2015 #3

We invaded the wrong country. onehandle Nov 2015 #4

snap! but since the bushes and saudis were bff's, restorefreedom Nov 2015 #6

Worst country and worst culture in the world. hifiguy Nov 2015 #60

But they have been bombing Syria n2doc Nov 2015 #7

They're not the same situation The2ndWheel Nov 2015 #8

yes, i did just see a reference restorefreedom Nov 2015 #15

but cheneys war for oil instead of going after obl AlbertCat Nov 2015 #41

They were the same on 9/11. Both were attacks by individuals jwirr Nov 2015 #58

The French and most other European nations hifiguy Nov 2015 #61

Exactly. jwirr Nov 2015 #63

I'm with you... Punkingal Nov 2015 #9

of course, their help would have only been helpful restorefreedom Nov 2015 #16

Bush chose to invade Iraq - Obama went after OBL & got him whathehell Nov 2015 #44

Bush: Truly not concerned about bin Laden Jarqui Nov 2015 #10

they didn't want obl. restorefreedom Nov 2015 #18

Well they actually cared about getting him, unlike Bush and his crew of thugs. Rex Nov 2015 #11

nope. they wanted their poster boy alive to wage more war. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #20

Agree 100% He was a very useful asset to the CIA...er...was a useful tool for the Reagan WH. Rex Nov 2015 #22

yup. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #25

This dude was more like Atta...the mastermind is al-Baghdadi, who will be harder to snag alcibiades_mystery Nov 2015 #12

true, but their diversion for oil did not help. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #24

Facts alcibiades_mystery Nov 2015 #28

:) nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #30

Just for the record they are heavily bombing ISIS targets. CentralMass Nov 2015 #13

It really helps when the mastermind is right in your own country. NuclearDem Nov 2015 #14

+1000 smirkymonkey Nov 2015 #39

Uh...he was in France. If bin Laden was in Oklahoma, we wouldn't need to invade either. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2015 #17

they still dropped the ball on obl to fulfill their restorefreedom Nov 2015 #23

Even if UBL HAD been in Oklahoma, hifiguy Nov 2015 #62

yup. 911 just gave them a convenient way in. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #64

If this report is correct, BlueMTexpat Nov 2015 #19

exactly. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #21

Yep, a whole other agenda by the Bush Cheney gang. Maineman Nov 2015 #32

Except when "Global Research" states something you know it's almost always BS.. EX500rider Nov 2015 #48

Gratefully, France has no history of involvement in foreign countries *coughIndoChinacough* Buzz Clik Nov 2015 #26

Well, we assured safe passage to the bin Laden family in the Baitball Blogger Nov 2015 #27

yup. they didn't really want to get him. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #29

+1000 heaven05 Nov 2015 #31

Pretty sure France bombed the bejeezus out of Raqqa Jester Messiah Nov 2015 #33

Yep... Helen Borg Nov 2015 #35

I begin to question the wisdom of that old saw. Jester Messiah Nov 2015 #47

You mean, the 10 year olds Helen Borg Nov 2015 #50

I find it a refreshing alternative to our bumbling anti-terrorism policies blackspade Nov 2015 #34

How do their rich people get richer without endless war??? nt valerief Nov 2015 #36

this is a stupid argument JI7 Nov 2015 #37

thank you for your substantive reply. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #43

I'm very upset. svpadgham Nov 2015 #38

Of course they didn't invade any countries to catch him, he was IN FRANCE! George II Nov 2015 #40

my point was they stayed on target restorefreedom Nov 2015 #42

Cheese eating surrender monkeys JEB Nov 2015 #45

More like the 1996 edhopper Nov 2015 #46

Bunch of cheese-eating surrender monkeys! KamaAina Nov 2015 #49

...and bombing multiple locations in Raqqa... brooklynite Nov 2015 #51

as we did in afghanistan nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #52

We didn't invade Afghanistan within a week of 9/11 either... brooklynite Nov 2015 #54

Give them time. It took us almost a month to invade another country after 9/11. Glassunion Nov 2015 #56

Ok. In fairness, we probably would have to if Osama Bin Laden was in NYC after 9/11. yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #57

its not completely analagous, restorefreedom Nov 2015 #59