Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ACA is in trouble and could be on course for a death spiral [View all]
https://www.cms.gov/cciio/resources/files/downloads/ehb-faq-508.pdf
How would the intended EHB policy affect self-insured group health plans,
grandfathered group health plans, and the large group market health plans? How would
employers sponsoring such plans determine which benefits are EHB when they offer
coverage to employees residing in more than one State?
A: Under the Affordable Care Act, self-insured group health plans, large group
market health plans, and grandfathered health plans are not required to offer EHB.
However, the prohibition in PHS Act section 2711 on imposing annual and lifetime
dollar limits on EHB does apply to self-insured group health plans, large group
market health plans, and grandfathered group market health plans. These plans
are permitted to impose non-dollar limits, consistent with other guidance, on EHB
as long as they comply with other applicable statutory provisions. In addition, these
plans can continue to impose annual and lifetime dollar limits on benefits that do
not fall within the definition of EHB.
How would the intended EHB policy affect self-insured group health plans,
grandfathered group health plans, and the large group market health plans? How would
employers sponsoring such plans determine which benefits are EHB when they offer
coverage to employees residing in more than one State?
A: Under the Affordable Care Act, self-insured group health plans, large group
market health plans, and grandfathered health plans are not required to offer EHB.
However, the prohibition in PHS Act section 2711 on imposing annual and lifetime
dollar limits on EHB does apply to self-insured group health plans, large group
market health plans, and grandfathered group market health plans. These plans
are permitted to impose non-dollar limits, consistent with other guidance, on EHB
as long as they comply with other applicable statutory provisions. In addition, these
plans can continue to impose annual and lifetime dollar limits on benefits that do
not fall within the definition of EHB.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Actually, you just repeated a bunch of pro-insurance company RW memes about the ACA like
FSogol
Nov 2015
#1
Yes, it is terrible when the uninsured get insurance, or when kids can stay on their
FSogol
Nov 2015
#17
I don't love it either, but it is what we have. It's better than the $1400/month
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2015
#10
1. Rising rates, but, no mention of rebates. 2. Profits down, but, down to what? 3. ...
Festivito
Nov 2015
#15
One way to frame it for them is to ask them how they feel knowing they won't have
davidpdx
Nov 2015
#95
Maybe if the CEO didn't take a 102 million dollar payout in 2010, they wouldn't have an issue
still_one
Nov 2015
#30
No, they have been badly managed even before the ACA. Wise and other rating agencies have rated
still_one
Nov 2015
#35
they are turning a profit, it just isn't a large as was estimated, but it is still huge. Even if
still_one
Nov 2015
#38
That's absurd; a bonus of 0.1% of market cap is not what causes their financial problems
Recursion
Nov 2015
#67
I am not sure if this is the way for the insurance companies to bargin or not, but I would pretty
still_one
Nov 2015
#27
At this point, what we need is a Congress that will act to fix problems in the ACA...
Agnosticsherbet
Nov 2015
#28
I don't think Rupert Murdoch's WSJ is a good source for the status of the ACA.
Todays_Illusion
Nov 2015
#29
don't know what you googled, or when, but this is what simple "aca" yielded for news just now:
magical thyme
Nov 2015
#54
The Wall Street Urinal is a Murdoch rag. They hate the ACA and slant their coverage of anything
madinmaryland
Nov 2015
#53
Financial analysis with a pretty clear set of political implications.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2015
#73
"young/healthy/male to subsidize the old/sick/female". ARE THERE NO OLD/SICK/MEN????????????????????
WinkyDink
Nov 2015
#64
The WSJ was also the source of that absurd assertion that "Sanders' Plan will cost 17 Trillion"
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2015
#72