General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]COLGATE4
(14,886 posts)tried to imply it with the 'I can't give you three years of law school...'snark. I hate to burst your self-righteous bubble but Constitutional questions aren't resolved on the basis of " my opinion is", "I think" or "it seems to me" or "it ought to be this way". They are resolved through case law, precedent and stare decisis. If you are making the argument that "x" means "y" then you are required to factually support it by citing to case law favorable to your position, (not by pointing to an internet link from a service that provides canned dissertations for Law School teachers). As you are unable to do this your assertions are nothing more than your personal, unsupported opinions. I'm sorry if you find this to be unreasonable - unfortunately, that's how it works.