So readers have the full picture.
Perhaps you can tell us how you think referring to a female presidential candidate as a "canine" is in keeping with the principles you list above, particularly number 7?
On Fri Nov 20, 2015, 11:26 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I think "far better" is a stretch
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1266415
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Offensive, sexist and juvenile effort at invoking the b-word.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Nov 20, 2015, 11:39 AM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude, crude and anti-woman and I am a woman who fully supports Bernie Sander's candidacy.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disgusting post that shows how misogynistic some of the hatred for Clinton is. The site owners should seriously consider this person's continued membership on DU.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Seriously?
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Ugh, give it a rest, folks.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Stay classy Bernistas.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Poor choice of metaphor though.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.