Yes, my definition of a liberal is clear for everyone to see. Why does it bother you so much?
You happily ignore your own definition of liberal when it comes to guns.
Why does me pointing it out bother
you so much?
You're very illiberal about guns:
il·lib·er·al
adjective
adjective: illiberal
1. opposed to liberal principles; restricting freedom of thought or behavior.
Textbook definition, right there.
This isnt about the dictionary, it is about ME and everybody can see that.
Yeah, you poor poor victim, how
dare anyone hoist you on your own petard.
I am very anti racist and anti death from guns and this REALLY bothers you, period.
Not at all. I too am very anti-racist and very anti death from guns. What bothers me is situational ethics, and situational ideology, precisely the thing you have demonstrated that you engage in, in this very thread.
I know why I piss people off, trust me, I know.
I wouldn't trust you to tie my shoe.
It almost always has to do with one of two things, guns or racism.
Well, this time, it has to do with situational application of ideology. You are no liberal, nor do you hold a view that is liberal, when it comes to guns.
I could understand attacking what is clearly liberal philosophy if this was free republic or something, but it isnt.
I could understand being accused of attacking you for liberal philosophy if I actually had done so, but you and I both know I haven't actually done that. What you're being ribbed about, is your less than consistent application of your own definition of the word 'liberal'. That's all on you.
All you have to say, is "you know what, you're correct" and we'll be done here.