Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ananda

(35,079 posts)
33. V. interesting connections
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 12:54 PM
Nov 2015

I appreciate seeing the way that exoticizing the "infidel" and making it French in order to provoke young French males, and the way that the idea of the harem somehow proves the moral superiority of the French in occupying and exploiting Muslim regions in North Africa and elsewhere.

This art and all the associated art and the avenues for exploration that it inspires is just wonderful. But the reality behind it all is something else entirely. I always wonder what incitement shows the reality to be more important than the mystique, in the same way that has happened with certain sports for example or the Catholic Church in these modern times.

Thus, if the outbreaks of Muslim rage these days does this, I would say fine... let the reality show itself out from behind all our cultural sugarcoating, no matter how beautiful or artistic. We need to see the truth... how those centuries of brutal hegemony, which hasn't really ended, are coming back to haunt us.

About the painting itself: I don't think the opium pipe is resting against a "narghile" but rather some kind of censer. Also, what is that ornamental object behind her back to the left of the peacock fan? I read a piece that said there was a zither in this painting, but I can't find it. Is that it?

Last, I also read something about Ingres' use of "disegno" in the making of this painting, that is, using drawing first. That was interesting because it stems from a belief that "disegno" is the secret behind sculpture and painting that turns craft into art.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Beautiful trumad Nov 2015 #1
thanks. it's a bit odd but I like it's satiny "look"... CTyankee Nov 2015 #4
Fascinating post, as always, my dear CTyankee! CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2015 #2
thanks. I think it is quite timely, too as we see events unfolding in the ME and CTyankee Nov 2015 #5
Beautiful and informative, as usual - thank you! djean111 Nov 2015 #3
Funny, about the last thing I think of when I see that painting Warpy Nov 2015 #6
Frankly, I find the title sarcastic in tone and meaning...I sawit somewhere and thought CTyankee Nov 2015 #7
Sarcasm makes sense but so does Warpy Nov 2015 #9
I think you are right about the temptation to read too much into paintings... CTyankee Nov 2015 #10
I also wanted to include exactly what you said about the skin color of the nude... CTyankee Nov 2015 #19
fantasique! flamingdem Nov 2015 #8
Thanks edhopper Nov 2015 #11
that is so good coming from you, ed... CTyankee Nov 2015 #13
It really is an explosive change from Ingress to Picasso edhopper Nov 2015 #15
well, also Picasso loved doing his own cubistic takes on so many other artists' famous CTyankee Nov 2015 #25
Great post! Generic Other Nov 2015 #12
I think it was those extra vertebrae that annoyed folks so much... CTyankee Nov 2015 #14
K & R femmocrat Nov 2015 #16
I always preferred this one. kwassa Nov 2015 #17
Hi CTYankee, we're glad you're back! Manifestor_of_Light Nov 2015 #18
I didn't see that! I'm so glad you shared it with me... CTyankee Nov 2015 #20
To me, it sems the beginning of the butt and breast pose KitSileya Nov 2015 #21
a very good point. When I was doing research for my essay on Delacroix's Women of CTyankee Nov 2015 #23
Minor nit-picking for educational purposes ;) kentauros Nov 2015 #22
here is a better close up of the instrument in the painting CTyankee Nov 2015 #24
I can see how it can be mistaken for a tambourine. kentauros Nov 2015 #39
it doesn't seem to be on a frame here. unless you mean just the rim of the instrument CTyankee Nov 2015 #41
Yes, it's on a frame. kentauros Nov 2015 #43
oh yes, the rim. i was totally thinking something else CTyankee Nov 2015 #45
Yes, that's also the frame. kentauros Nov 2015 #46
I know nothing about that musical instrument. So I'm glad this came up in the discussion CTyankee Nov 2015 #47
i absolutely love that Remo video. What a thrilling sound... CTyankee Nov 2015 #28
It is, indeed! kentauros Nov 2015 #36
She is great - never heard a tambourine played that way, loved it. JudyM Apr 2017 #48
Ingres' depiction of feet seems a little odd. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #26
her right arm is strange, too. and that left leg... CTyankee Nov 2015 #27
If I wanted to suggest a common theme, the term sinuous would come to mind. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #30
ouch, that's a painful thought... CTyankee Nov 2015 #32
As always, thank you K&R etherealtruth Nov 2015 #29
thanks so much...I want the Saturday DU folks to see the painting and hopefully contribute CTyankee Nov 2015 #31
V. interesting connections ananda Nov 2015 #33
About disegno it was the overarching principle of the Renaissance in Florence, following CTyankee Nov 2015 #34
question ananda Nov 2015 #35
Oh, you mean disegno in terms of having it sketched out beforehand...now I get your context. CTyankee Nov 2015 #38
Thanks CT--did you hear about this Verona art theft? panader0 Nov 2015 #37
no I didn't, thanks for showing me this...that is awful...but luckily, if it follows most CTyankee Nov 2015 #40
I was taught that The Odalisque was a scandal because of the annabanana Nov 2015 #42
here's a fun explanation for you from Wikipedia... CTyankee Nov 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Woman’s Pleasure: the G...»Reply #33