Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
26. " Statistically any DU jury is majority Sanders supporters"
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 02:24 PM
Nov 2015

Really? Well that's interesting. So there's NO chance THIS jury was weighted with Hillarites - or are jurors selected from those who respond, based on what "camp" they fall into? Let's be honest - anything is possible.


"Offensive, sexist and juvenile effort at invoking the b-word."

Let's break this down and analyze it a bit...

"Offensive" - If you're a Clinton supporter, you're going to be offended if someone suggests your favorite is a lackey of corporations. I get that. Even if it IS true, I get that it offends Hillary's supporters. The aim of my alerted comment was to reaffirm my support for someone who will work for the people who fund the respective campaigns. (and remember! As Mitt assured us last campaign: Corporations ARE people, my friend!) There's a particular shade of glasses worn by many around here that let in only selected wave lengths of light. And while it's strictly speculation, I'll bet some of them have been offended when I've suggested that we'd be better off selecting the next president by their allegiances and record rather than solely on their gender.

So - about that B-word I'm now vilely guilty of.... What if I'd have said "psittacine" instead of canine? What invocation would I be guilty of then? I honestly can see pisttacine being appropriate. Fact is, I know pisttacines really well. And there IS a common connotation that's oft times used in referring to politicians as pisttacines (or their more common name - which I'm certain the intellect here will readily recognize). But using that reference has no gender suggestivity to it. Or maybe my alerter can point out to me - what does their Websters Unabridged book of elastic insinuations have to say about the sexual innuendo of pisttacine.

And what about "Feline"? No - no - oh GOD no - that would invoke as horrified a response as canine - what with the slang that ties women to female cats.

How about "puppet"? Are there any connotations to "puppet" that could ire a particular candidate's supporter? I mean, besides the obvious ones. I'm asking about gender-suggestive connotations of puppet. See - I wanna be able to tip-toe thru the politically correct, linguistic minefield that DU is turning into.

LOL!!! I just now reflected on the many posts of late about real DU veterans being muted or given the boot from here. And I had thought - surely - such a fate won't befall a goofy, little crowd heckler like me! But the bug spray, bug zapper, flyswatter phenomenon that's infecting this place like a plague of locusts is a statement in itself of the growing intolerance here. It was probably just a matter of time before someone pointed at me and twisted my rhetoric to indicate that I am one who's not swallowed the DWS Kool-ade - and consequently needs to be whacked into line. "Hey! Someone tell that idiot that this is DU - not D/SU!

Words have meaning - often several meanings (See "liberal&quot . And oft times, words that have been around for ages have been twisted to mean things they never ever did when they were initially coined or recognized. But to convict me of INSINUATING an offensive connotation based on some insecure sort's personal interpretation - what the hell has become of this place? I mean - REALLY? You could SEE just how my synapses worked in less than adroit ways to slip a misogynistic slight past the DU word police??? Hey DU is DU. But in the real world - folks have spent DECADES of their innocent lives in prison thanks to what jurors tried to read into a suspect's mind. Often lead to THAT reading by the slant of the prosecutor! Insinuating that I was invoking the "B-word" is really a stretch as well as an indication of the insecurities of the accuser. Of course, there's probably quite a number of innocent folks incarcerated because of what jurors "read" into suggestive testimony and ill-founded fears.

No - no... I get it. I'm a juvenile nitwit and seven folks (do I HAVE TO call them "peers"?) have convicted me of slandering the anointed one (DAMN! There I go again! - is it possible to alert on myself? Is there anything gender-insinuating about "anointed"?) Please - some word-nick - do the "Right" thing here. Deny this cretin his voice!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Somebody clue me please.... [View all] Plucketeer Nov 2015 OP
best definition ever ... napkinz Nov 2015 #1
Amen (n/t) PJMcK Nov 2015 #2
Nice :) n/t Zing Zing Zingbah Nov 2015 #3
+1,000,000 ... 000 HuckleB Nov 2015 #13
I don't see how those 7 choices clash, so why not pick them all? Rex Nov 2015 #4
My definition of a liberal is someone who will defer to the person who knows more randys1 Nov 2015 #5
Are you sure you want to defer? dmr Nov 2015 #6
No, I mean defer. If a Woman tells me something is misogynist, I will trust her, period. randys1 Nov 2015 #7
I understand what you're saying, and ... Whiskeytide Nov 2015 #9
When are you going to defer to people that know more about guns than you do? beevul Nov 2015 #11
You dont know more about guns than I do. randys1 Nov 2015 #12
Says you. beevul Nov 2015 #14
Bullshit, you went out of your way to talk ONLY to me and nothing to do with the topic randys1 Nov 2015 #15
I was discussing YOUR definition of liberal randy. Completely on topic. beevul Nov 2015 #19
I am sorry if liberal philosophy bothers you...It clearly does. You and maybe two others randys1 Nov 2015 #20
How would you know? beevul Nov 2015 #21
I am sorry that NOT being a racist or misogynist or homophobe and respecting them randys1 Nov 2015 #22
Try to stay on topic. We're discussing the definition of liberal. beevul Nov 2015 #23
Yes, my definition of a liberal is clear for everyone to see. Why does it bother you so much? randys1 Nov 2015 #24
You're very illiberal about guns. beevul Nov 2015 #25
They look good to me, but the 5th Amendment takes a beating, here. nt Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #8
Here's why I asked... Plucketeer Nov 2015 #10
Here are the jury results BainsBane Nov 2015 #16
Yup, I can Plucketeer Nov 2015 #17
Clearly 6 jurors disagreed. BainsBane Nov 2015 #18
" Statistically any DU jury is majority Sanders supporters" Plucketeer Nov 2015 #26
If it helps, I would have voted to hide it had I been on that jury. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2015 #27
Thanks for your reply Plucketeer Nov 2015 #28
Have a super Saturday. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2015 #29
"but now you're upset that you don't get to continue using degrading terms about women." Plucketeer Nov 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Somebody clue me please.....»Reply #26