Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

herding cats

(20,050 posts)
7. The point is he can make gains for the people there.
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 01:55 AM
Nov 2015

This is how things were done before the Great Purge in 2010. By and large the candidates sucked to our standards, but they sucked a hell of a lot less than the Tea Party candidates who swept them out of office.

The end result is the poorest people, the women and the minorities suffer the brunt of these changeovers. Then there's the laws they enact, some of which end go up to the SC and could very well end up impacting all of us before this is said and done.

It's was far from perfect, but it was better before than it is now. What matters is if the people are being disenfranchised from voting by lawmakers, if women are losing their right to choice, if minorities are living with racist policies, if the public educational system is being gutted, and if the impoverish are being denied a chance healthcare and to get out of poverty. To name a few things.

If we can fight some of these things, maybe even erase a few of the regional losses in those areas, it puts us on better footing to gain support in the future there. Not to mention the population has a better chance of feeling real improvements in their lives. Which really does matter when it comes to local politics. What we have to overcome is the bigoted hate and divisive mentality the Republicans have fostered there first. Which takes time, and a lot of delicate stepping until your gains are sustainable in the region.

I wish it wasn't like this. I wish things were cut and dried in the land of local politics like some people believe they are. But, it's not. We're not even close to that stage of majority social evolution yet in some of our states. We do have some true progressives in all states, though. Which is great news! We need to keep them working toward changing the minds of the populations in their regions, and believe it or not, a moderate kicking someone like Vitter to the curb is something being celebrated by a lot of real progressives in Louisiana tonight. It's a fire they hopefully can use to ignite others to their way of thinking a little at a time.

Every step in the right direction is one less in the wrong one. Unless you live under some really insane RW rule at the moment, I realize that's not an easy thing to understand out of hand. Some peoples lives have been going backwards now for years in ways many people don't bother to stop and think about much, and this is a salve to one state's population of such people.

I just hope it works out for them if even only marginally.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think a lot of DUers must live on the coasts Ex Lurker Nov 2015 #1
If you're talking about Louisiana, it's on the coast. So is Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia... Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #10
The reply means the Northeast and West Coast. NutmegYankee Nov 2015 #22
If you're thinking of a type that hangs on the GD-P forum, Hortensis Nov 2015 #28
He's not a moderate, he's a conservative (n/t) Spider Jerusalem Nov 2015 #2
DU would consider him a DINO Ex Lurker Nov 2015 #4
You don't need to tell me that, I lived in Georgia. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2015 #5
What's the point? tularetom Nov 2015 #3
The point is he can make gains for the people there. herding cats Nov 2015 #7
I remember being told we were still going forward, even if we had to sit in the back of the bus. jtuck004 Nov 2015 #13
That's what you go from my words. herding cats Nov 2015 #14
What I actually get from your words is that you seem to get offended by people who you pretend to be jtuck004 Nov 2015 #15
This governor is literally, quite literally, going to save lives. joshcryer Nov 2015 #17
You sound convinced. Again. I'll save my cheerleading for after they make the plays. n/t jtuck004 Nov 2015 #18
The Medicaid expansion is by Executive Order. joshcryer Nov 2015 #19
My standards won't ever get low enough to think that is much of anything. Too many tradeoffs. n/t jtuck004 Nov 2015 #20
Blame Louisianans who won't vote pro-choice... joshcryer Nov 2015 #21
I agree re Southern Dems promsing to expand Medicare. That was, I believe, the biggest mistake No Vested Interest Nov 2015 #24
So you think Vitter = Edwards TeddyR Nov 2015 #30
Vitter is a POS, and I hope he doesn't = Edwards tularetom Nov 2015 #32
It's a good win. herding cats Nov 2015 #6
I agree cats, sometimes you look for the silver lining Dr. Xavier Nov 2015 #8
Vitter has announced that he will not run for re-election to the Senate. No Vested Interest Nov 2015 #11
How did the Dems do in the down ballot races? Did the Edwards votes No Vested Interest Nov 2015 #9
Christ, what a bore MisterP Nov 2015 #12
Thanks for posting that. murielm99 Nov 2015 #16
It's part of the polarization of politics FLPanhandle Nov 2015 #23
I remember when they cheered Mary Landrieu's defeat BainsBane Nov 2015 #25
Exactly treestar Nov 2015 #26
I think where it could change is if one put up populist conservative candidates... cascadiance Nov 2015 #27
I'm glad he won too, RedStateBlues. He may not Hortensis Nov 2015 #29
He seems to be a pretty solid Dem TeddyR Nov 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Like it or not, Puritopia...»Reply #7