Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats push to prevent gun sales to those on terror list [View all]EV_Ares
(6,587 posts)61. Thanks Lizzie, you are correct & also correct in that some names do appear on both.
That said, the changes or revisions that have been made on the "No Fly List" should be made on the Terrorist Watch List as well. I agree that an individual should have the right to be told how & why he is on the list so the revisions for the No Fly list should work on the other as well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The list in question is not the 'no fly' list, it's a much broader list of people for
petronius
Nov 2015
#5
So, why not use your same suggest6ions for immigrants coming into this country. The same people
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#9
Feinstein's proposal is a Bush/Cheney proposal from 2005 that was roundly rejected.
benEzra
Nov 2015
#66
Fuck this unconstitutional piece of shit (the no-fly / terror list) and anybody who supports it. n/t
X_Digger
Nov 2015
#11
Feel free to give up your liberties for the illusion of safety. Not mine, thanks.
X_Digger
Nov 2015
#18
You don't think things change over time or years including documents, laws or needs.
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#30
Use some logic, you don't think things change, documents, laws refined over time, over years.
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#32
"Times change" sounds like "be afraid". Go ahead and let them scare you. I won't nt
Logical
Nov 2015
#49
Who controls the list and how can this be Constitutional given the 5th Amendment?
NutmegYankee
Nov 2015
#28
I don't care what some blowhard says. I care about Civil Liberties of US Citizens.
NutmegYankee
Nov 2015
#34
Well, fortunately, his voice along with more important people's voices get heard over what you care
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#35
ROFL - again your opinion which certainly doesn't account for much as far as many are concerned.
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#41
Why are you here? Do you make the determination now of who can come here? LOL, you are hilarious.
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#44
So, nothing wrong with that. Again, I have as much right to be here as you & your name-callling
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#48
Look, now you have to lie to try to support your own personal opinion. I have never stated I am
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#51
It seems like a no brainer, but the other part of Feinstein's bill is more important.
Vinca
Nov 2015
#38
We are not willing to pass regualtions when a man puts bullets in the heads of 6 year olds,
Agnosticsherbet
Nov 2015
#52
Denial of a right without due process or even the ability to fight or appeal it is wrong. Period.
Lee-Lee
Nov 2015
#53
Thanks Lizzie, you are correct & also correct in that some names do appear on both.
EV_Ares
Nov 2015
#61
The no-fly list is a subset of the consolidated watchlist, so everyone on the
petronius
Nov 2015
#64
No. That is the No Fly List, the Terrorist Watch List is larger and has no due process at all
Lee-Lee
Nov 2015
#57