General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why this lionization of JFK? [View all]BainsBane
(57,760 posts)and didn't have to earn his money through unseemly activities like writing books and giving speeches. Plus he's male so it's okay that he was super rich. Women who make even a fraction of that kind of wealth are unacceptable because they exceed their rightful place in life. We see the same adulation of FDR, John Kerry and one percenters like Al Gore. But Clinton having a few million bucks is a crime against huMANity.
Sarcasm aside, I think it's because for many here he represents their youth, a time when they still believed in the United States and its government as a source of good. It certainly isn't that administrations, including JFK's, didn't engage in imperialistic activities abroad, but people didn't pay much attention or even know about it.It was also a time when the white middle-class prospered, men especially. Those are the good old days that some here openly long for. Of course it was also a time of Jim Crow and the denial of rights to women and LGBT.