Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oldernwiser

(52 posts)
31. I hate to say this
Mon May 28, 2012, 06:55 PM
May 2012

But, Romney is right - for the wrong reason.

First of all, people tend to forget that insurance isn't free money. It gets funded from a pool of contributors, and the healthier they are the more funding the pool gets. If people wait until they REALLY need medical attention before they subscribe to a plan then what you end up with is negative cash flow into the pool. It's unfortunate that the healthiest among us feel that since they're never sick and live a healthy lifestyle that there's no reason for them to "waste" their money on insurance.

The national healthcare act is, in my opinion, a time bomb. Essentially, it says that everyone gets accepted into a health plan regardless of ongoing issues. It will force private insurers to accept not just a risk but the CERTAINTY of paying out more money than they currently take in which will raise premiums across the board. Those unable to afford the private insurers rates will be able to get a government sponsored policy, so if the healthiest of us are enrolled privately then the government will take on the negative cash flow issue which will result in much higher taxes across the board - the working middle class being hardest hit without regard to where they're insured.

Our current hospital regulations say that public hospitals must accept patients regardless of their ability to pay. This is a good thing - it keeps poorer people from needlessly dying. But, if a hospital takes in 5 people who can't pay and 1 who can, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the 1 who can pay, pays for the 5 who can't. This is why the cost of health care keeps spiraling upward, especially when the economy slows down and people are out of work: 5 people become 10 or 15 or 50. We all carry that economic burden whether we're insured or not. Insurance companies have to cap their payouts to keep hospitals from hitting them with inflated costs, but since the amount they pay is negotiated annually, even THAT figure goes up over time.

The point of the OP was to say that we need to do something about the uninsured problem, but the real issue is how to keep medical costs from skyrocketing until we have to be one of the 1% to get our injuries fixed. If we are going to accept having to pay for those who can't pay for themselves, then maybe we really ought to scrap insurance altogether and fully nationalize our healthcare industry - that would mean contributing to a medical pool in the form of direct taxation. Since we're paying for it already every time we see a doctor or visit a hospital, the costs might as well be fairly distributed.

The GOP position on this issue is just plain wrong as well. They figure that it's unfair to expect those who work to have to pay for those who don't in the form of taxes. The thing is, if we only pay when we need treatment then we can expect to have to pay $5000 for a single nebulizer treatment and a prescription at our local hospitals. And the more people who can't pay will most certainly make $5000 a bargain in a few years. The GOP's staunch refusal to even consider nationalization guarantees that more public hospitals will close - further increasing wait times, driving the most qualified doctors into private hospitals and killing our healthcare as we know it.

Obama was on the right track, but his legislation doesn't go far enough - it treats insurance as the problem instead of taking on the way we apportion healthcare and it's costs.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I was thrown into the health care system 3 years ago NV Whino May 2012 #1
The last two times I walked in somewhere EFerrari May 2012 #2
If you can survive emergency room healthcare.... kentuck May 2012 #3
In fairness Prophet 451 May 2012 #4
The problem with your story is that the Health Care law will not change a thing in it. former9thward May 2012 #5
I believe that that was part of what the OP was talking about.... daleanime May 2012 #14
Spot on: we really can't afford NOT to frazzled May 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author ErikJ May 2012 #7
The last few times I had to go to the hospital, I called my Primary Physician to "pre" admit WCGreen May 2012 #8
Single-payer wouldn't cost the public anymore than the current system does. Cost isn't the HiPointDem May 2012 #9
Single Payer costs much less murphyj87 May 2012 #12
The only reason we don't have single-payer healthcare... kentuck May 2012 #15
These are the high costs of a nation that would rather DIE than admit they're wrong. HughBeaumont May 2012 #19
Also.... murphyj87 May 2012 #33
Most of rmoney and his %1lk don't cut up stuff for their own dinner...their maid/cook does and... Tikki May 2012 #10
K&R hay rick May 2012 #11
Our health care costs more than The Wizard May 2012 #13
K&R. Well said. Overseas May 2012 #16
The author's suggestion at the end makes too much sense, so it will never happen in our system! Dustlawyer May 2012 #17
I'll be dropping like a fly chervilant May 2012 #18
It speaks to priorities. TBF May 2012 #20
At least your ER had triage....ours did not when Mr. D.'s lung collapsed. dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #21
You are a family physician and made your husband wait 3 hours A Simple Game May 2012 #22
Physician's treating family members is frowned upon, so I try not to do it. McCamy Taylor May 2012 #28
Maybe you could sterilize the needle mojowork_n May 2012 #29
there is no dr. i've ever known who has had to spend (or would waste their very expensive time) datasuspect May 2012 #34
Yup, I know what you're saying. n/t A Simple Game May 2012 #36
you hit the nail on the head. if this is to be an economic discussion...BRING IT ON. nashville_brook May 2012 #23
National health care Godot51 May 2012 #24
The really sad thing is that THIS story is repeated... bvar22 May 2012 #25
But, but.... Turbineguy May 2012 #26
Actually.... oldernwiser May 2012 #32
I had to go to an emergency room in Nova Scotia, while on vacation 3 years ago...... my secondwind May 2012 #27
Your post does point out how broken our system is in. GObamaGO May 2012 #30
I hate to say this oldernwiser May 2012 #31
Great post aint_no_life_nowhere May 2012 #35
she's a doctor. why didn't she just stitch it up herself? Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One Long Monday Night in ...»Reply #31