Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasProgresive

(12,753 posts)
8. No a "friendly" would not have been shot down
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:26 AM
Nov 2015

Because the IFF Transponder would've responded with the current friendly code.

Back when George I declared a "no fly" zone in Northern Iraq to protect the Kurds from Saddam's chopper attacks a UN chopper full of high level people was shot down. The explanation is the IFF did not respond with the new safe code.

Last report I read 1 pilot was rescued by Russian forces from Turkman fighters operating in Serbia. The other was killed by the same group. Not to give them a break, but since this group was the target of the Russian bombs I can see that as elevating their anger. These things happen in war.

Considering that we would not allow the guerrillas the protections of the Geneva Convention it seems moot to even bring that up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

. jberryhill Nov 2015 #1
In the UK too. StrayKat Nov 2015 #2
I'm short on time, but SCVDem Nov 2015 #3
Yes, lots of new lows. IsItJustMe Nov 2015 #6
+1. bemildred Nov 2015 #7
No a "friendly" would not have been shot down TexasProgresive Nov 2015 #8
You live in a glass house nationalize the fed Nov 2015 #4
yep 840high Nov 2015 #5
Glass houses is right. But anything to further the red-baiting Russophobia here polly7 Nov 2015 #9
Remember 1983 Mendocino Nov 2015 #10
And if our air defense capablities had been up to snuff 09/11/2001 TexasProgresive Nov 2015 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Putin has been extremely ...»Reply #8