Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(10,960 posts)

1. I would hate to see that happen

Mon May 28, 2012, 09:31 PM

May 2012

It would co-opt one of the most valuable voices we have.

Now if Krugman were speaker of the House that would be different.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If Obama appointed Paul Krugman as WH advisor... [View all] MannyGoldstein May 2012 OP

I would hate to see that happen cthulu2016 May 2012 #1

Perhaps MannyGoldstein May 2012 #2

Co-option was probably not the right word. Silenced is closer to it. cthulu2016 May 2012 #4

Good points. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #7

I would be much more enthuiastic.... unkachuck May 2012 #3

Obama said my wife and I should 'have our heads examined' (on "60 Minutes") coalition_unwilling May 2012 #10

Ditto. Webster Green May 2012 #15

That's it in a nutshell. There are times, though, in human affairs when selecting coalition_unwilling May 2012 #17

Do you think Krugman would accept or keep the position MannyGoldstein May 2012 #6

Dunno limpyhobbler May 2012 #12

Krugman is still too wrapped up in neoclassical thinking. girl gone mad May 2012 #8

Well, can we agree that compared to the current riff-raff, MannyGoldstein May 2012 #11

The neoclassical economist is much like the Darwinian cthulu2016 May 2012 #14

Monkeys would fly out of my butt too, but hell yeah I'd be coalition_unwilling May 2012 #9

It wouldn't be a bad idea I guess, Jamaal510 May 2012 #13