Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Take Away All Guns If Posible - Agree? - 33,000 Lives Saved Per Year Worth It? [View all]Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)196. Spare us the bullshit amateur psychoanalysis.
We're not "afraid of doing what needs to be done," we're rejecting that it (a complete gun ban) does indeed "need to be done."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
276 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Take Away All Guns If Posible - Agree? - 33,000 Lives Saved Per Year Worth It? [View all]
Yallow
Nov 2015
OP
But toting is almost impossible, and no one would be allowed to fill up 4 gun safes
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#4
How do you know in a drunken rage, it wouldn't have happened with some other means/
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#120
Guns make it sooooo much easier for acts of impulsive violence, but you knew that. nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#121
easier (adj) - achieved without great effort; presenting few difficulties. nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#125
Regardless, a firearm isn't needed to injure or kill someone in an act of impulsive violence,
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#126
When is the last time someone alcoholed someone else to death, or went postal with their 40oz? nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#265
So it's the heavy machinery being operated that killed someone else, not the alcohol.
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#275
Since 2/3's of those deaths are suicides it is likely they would seek other means..
EX500rider
Nov 2015
#2
The Japanese sure have seemed to find ways other than firearms to commit suicide.
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#61
Yeah but if you take away the gun, the other methods will rise dramatically
davidn3600
Nov 2015
#258
Ah, because we allow alcohol, we can't restrict gunz. I read Zman saying something like
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#5
If you have a gun or 2 strapped on, a hero mentality, train to shoot people, display paranoia/fear,
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#81
Pretending that there is any "unlimited access to unlimited weapons" doesn't help.
beevul
Nov 2015
#266
It's already illegal for someone ADJUDICATED as a danger to themselves or others
branford
Nov 2015
#193
If I had my way, and it was my decision, I would make all criminals disappear.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#231
"Do you really need your guns if the nut jobs and criminals can't find, or have them?"
EX500rider
Nov 2015
#175
I'll keep my firearms. If you don't want to have anything to do with them, don't buy any.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#229
I've got a resource for anyone who thinks all gun owners are eager to murder
LittleBlue
Nov 2015
#139
That has to be one of the most ridiculous statements I've read. I guess you have interviewed tens of
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#228
I don't think that is the issue here, what it is really about is the impossible logistics of collect
Rex
Nov 2015
#13
So what do you do when 50 million people refuse to turn them in and file lawsuits against the govt?
Rex
Nov 2015
#23
Seems more of an indictment of the medical and legal industries than of guns.
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#154
My Problem Is This Also Isn't Being Discussed - Why The Media Blackout? - 229 Billion A Year
Yallow
Nov 2015
#145
And Be Completely Unarmed In A Country Full Of Psychopath Nut Jobs? Not Ready....
Yallow
Nov 2015
#80
"Americans obviously can't handle guns." The only thing "obvious" about that is that it's nonsense.
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#76
And The Crazies Kill The Children Of The "Responsible" Gun Owners Every Damn Day
Yallow
Nov 2015
#91
Tell me what you know about the word "militia" and its etymology... what did it mean in the 1700s?
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2015
#87
I'd say Americans handle guns quite well. 80-100 million gun owners of 310+ million firearms. When
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#234
How many deaths would it be worth to try to round up all the firearms in this country?
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#18
I agree. We can wish something to be practical all we want to, won't change reality any.
Rex
Nov 2015
#34
Better yet...what do you do with the 50 million people that refuse to hand them over?
Rex
Nov 2015
#25
They Say All Laws Won't Help - No Laws Could Have Stopped It - Their Gun Defense
Yallow
Nov 2015
#43
When you talk about restricting gunz, you see just how UNlaw-abiding gunners are. Not a one of them
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#72
You're talking to a group of people taught Thoreau's Resistance to Civil Government
NutmegYankee
Nov 2015
#90
If you think you need guns to fight the government, you're mentally unfit to own guns
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#159
Hmm, I thought this sub-thread was about not giving up your guns to a tyranical gov't. Silly me. nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#164
Might as well start somewhere; otherwise you'll be saying "500 million firearms" in 2030.
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#38
Why should I, as a responsible firearm owner who's firearms have never been a part of that cost,
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#242
The only thing I agree with is heavy penalties for misuse. And I think we already have that, but
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#246
Easily obtained instructions and 3D printing have made that idea more of an obsolete...
Shandris
Nov 2015
#22
It will never happen, of course, but I don't see any reason why we can't regulate
Vinca
Nov 2015
#26
Are you saying that all semi-automatic guns should be made illegal to own?
Snobblevitch
Nov 2015
#37
There are tens (if not hundreds) of millions of semi-automatics already out there.
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#57
If you don't need to "spray" the bullets, what's the point of having the AR platform?
Vinca
Nov 2015
#223
No they aren't, and the AR is not an assault weapon. They lack the automatic part.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#235
Every hunter wants a one shot kill for game. Instead of cycling the bolt myself, the semi-automatic
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#233
Our local news just had a story about police investigating a domestic violence case.
Vinca
Nov 2015
#219
Did Australia take away rifles too? There are still hunters in America, and rifles are harder to
yurbud
Nov 2015
#31
It's at this point everyone on this board should stop taking you seriously.
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2015
#144
Not gonna happen and most would oppose it, but yes i absolutely would support it. n/t
Daniel537
Nov 2015
#35
The Powers That Be - Consider This - Culling The Herd - Will Never Happen
cantbeserious
Nov 2015
#54
Would You Give Yours Up If Everyone Else Gave Up Theirs To Save 229 Billion A Year?
Yallow
Nov 2015
#74
Owners die, and if transfer is illegal then that gun will be collected and destroyed
mwrguy
Nov 2015
#78
Repealing the second would not remove the right. The bill of rights grants no rights.
X_Digger
Nov 2015
#123
Just my personal opinion: America simply can't handle guns. Whatever the reason,..
BlueJazz
Nov 2015
#102
Not a gun owner myself, but I love the idea that good citizens in this country have the freedom to
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#166
As others have already indicated, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides,
branford
Nov 2015
#188
Nope, don't agree at all. And 2/3's of those deaths are suicide. You think that will stop people?
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#226
I own guns and shoot guns but admit there is a issue with guns in this country. People like you.....
Logical
Nov 2015
#254
There are 9000 gun murders. The others are suicide. They would happen either way. nt
Logical
Nov 2015
#250