Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(24,461 posts)

15. "Democrats" . . . used loosely and facetiously, of course.

Mon Nov 30, 2015, 05:15 PM

Nov 2015

With "Democrats" like Max Baucus and Joe Lieberturd, who needs Republicans?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yeah, we'd better just forget about ever having Universal Health Care in America. [View all] HughBeaumont Nov 2015 OP

Oh, I don't know. PETRUS Nov 2015 #4

it gives us something to taunt, I presume MisterP Nov 2015 #7

You know who wanted UHC back in 1961? Octafish Nov 2015 #2

Crreeeeeeeping (FRIGHT TONES) SOSHULISM!! HughBeaumont Nov 2015 #3

Think of the TRILLIONS in savings! Octafish Nov 2015 #6

Hey, Hillary's bankster/MIC BFFs NEED that money. hifiguy Nov 2015 #9

Hush money, however, buys a LOT. HughBeaumont Nov 2015 #10

Indeed it does. hifiguy Nov 2015 #11

For the forseeable future, yes you should. Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2015 #12

What's weird is we DEMOCRATS had all that in 2009. Octafish Nov 2015 #13

"Democrats" . . . used loosely and facetiously, of course. HughBeaumont Nov 2015 #15

And before we retake state legislatures . . . . HughBeaumont Nov 2015 #14

+1 think Dec 2015 #17

sigh... Phentex Dec 2015 #18