Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Take Away All Guns If Posible - Agree? - 33,000 Lives Saved Per Year Worth It? [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)276. Easier. Easier. Easier. Say it with me: Easier. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
276 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Take Away All Guns If Posible - Agree? - 33,000 Lives Saved Per Year Worth It? [View all]
Yallow
Nov 2015
OP
But toting is almost impossible, and no one would be allowed to fill up 4 gun safes
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#4
How do you know in a drunken rage, it wouldn't have happened with some other means/
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#120
Guns make it sooooo much easier for acts of impulsive violence, but you knew that. nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#121
easier (adj) - achieved without great effort; presenting few difficulties. nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#125
Regardless, a firearm isn't needed to injure or kill someone in an act of impulsive violence,
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#126
When is the last time someone alcoholed someone else to death, or went postal with their 40oz? nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#265
So it's the heavy machinery being operated that killed someone else, not the alcohol.
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#275
Since 2/3's of those deaths are suicides it is likely they would seek other means..
EX500rider
Nov 2015
#2
The Japanese sure have seemed to find ways other than firearms to commit suicide.
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#61
Yeah but if you take away the gun, the other methods will rise dramatically
davidn3600
Nov 2015
#258
Ah, because we allow alcohol, we can't restrict gunz. I read Zman saying something like
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#5
If you have a gun or 2 strapped on, a hero mentality, train to shoot people, display paranoia/fear,
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#81
Pretending that there is any "unlimited access to unlimited weapons" doesn't help.
beevul
Nov 2015
#266
It's already illegal for someone ADJUDICATED as a danger to themselves or others
branford
Nov 2015
#193
If I had my way, and it was my decision, I would make all criminals disappear.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#231
"Do you really need your guns if the nut jobs and criminals can't find, or have them?"
EX500rider
Nov 2015
#175
I'll keep my firearms. If you don't want to have anything to do with them, don't buy any.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#229
I've got a resource for anyone who thinks all gun owners are eager to murder
LittleBlue
Nov 2015
#139
That has to be one of the most ridiculous statements I've read. I guess you have interviewed tens of
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#228
I don't think that is the issue here, what it is really about is the impossible logistics of collect
Rex
Nov 2015
#13
So what do you do when 50 million people refuse to turn them in and file lawsuits against the govt?
Rex
Nov 2015
#23
Seems more of an indictment of the medical and legal industries than of guns.
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#154
My Problem Is This Also Isn't Being Discussed - Why The Media Blackout? - 229 Billion A Year
Yallow
Nov 2015
#145
And Be Completely Unarmed In A Country Full Of Psychopath Nut Jobs? Not Ready....
Yallow
Nov 2015
#80
"Americans obviously can't handle guns." The only thing "obvious" about that is that it's nonsense.
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#76
And The Crazies Kill The Children Of The "Responsible" Gun Owners Every Damn Day
Yallow
Nov 2015
#91
Tell me what you know about the word "militia" and its etymology... what did it mean in the 1700s?
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2015
#87
I'd say Americans handle guns quite well. 80-100 million gun owners of 310+ million firearms. When
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#234
How many deaths would it be worth to try to round up all the firearms in this country?
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#18
I agree. We can wish something to be practical all we want to, won't change reality any.
Rex
Nov 2015
#34
Better yet...what do you do with the 50 million people that refuse to hand them over?
Rex
Nov 2015
#25
They Say All Laws Won't Help - No Laws Could Have Stopped It - Their Gun Defense
Yallow
Nov 2015
#43
When you talk about restricting gunz, you see just how UNlaw-abiding gunners are. Not a one of them
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#72
You're talking to a group of people taught Thoreau's Resistance to Civil Government
NutmegYankee
Nov 2015
#90
If you think you need guns to fight the government, you're mentally unfit to own guns
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#159
Hmm, I thought this sub-thread was about not giving up your guns to a tyranical gov't. Silly me. nt
Electric Monk
Nov 2015
#164
Might as well start somewhere; otherwise you'll be saying "500 million firearms" in 2030.
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#38
Why should I, as a responsible firearm owner who's firearms have never been a part of that cost,
GGJohn
Nov 2015
#242
The only thing I agree with is heavy penalties for misuse. And I think we already have that, but
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#246
Easily obtained instructions and 3D printing have made that idea more of an obsolete...
Shandris
Nov 2015
#22
It will never happen, of course, but I don't see any reason why we can't regulate
Vinca
Nov 2015
#26
Are you saying that all semi-automatic guns should be made illegal to own?
Snobblevitch
Nov 2015
#37
There are tens (if not hundreds) of millions of semi-automatics already out there.
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#57
If you don't need to "spray" the bullets, what's the point of having the AR platform?
Vinca
Nov 2015
#223
No they aren't, and the AR is not an assault weapon. They lack the automatic part.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#235
Every hunter wants a one shot kill for game. Instead of cycling the bolt myself, the semi-automatic
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#233
Our local news just had a story about police investigating a domestic violence case.
Vinca
Nov 2015
#219
Did Australia take away rifles too? There are still hunters in America, and rifles are harder to
yurbud
Nov 2015
#31
It's at this point everyone on this board should stop taking you seriously.
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2015
#144
Not gonna happen and most would oppose it, but yes i absolutely would support it. n/t
Daniel537
Nov 2015
#35
The Powers That Be - Consider This - Culling The Herd - Will Never Happen
cantbeserious
Nov 2015
#54
Would You Give Yours Up If Everyone Else Gave Up Theirs To Save 229 Billion A Year?
Yallow
Nov 2015
#74
Owners die, and if transfer is illegal then that gun will be collected and destroyed
mwrguy
Nov 2015
#78
Repealing the second would not remove the right. The bill of rights grants no rights.
X_Digger
Nov 2015
#123
Just my personal opinion: America simply can't handle guns. Whatever the reason,..
BlueJazz
Nov 2015
#102
Not a gun owner myself, but I love the idea that good citizens in this country have the freedom to
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#166
As others have already indicated, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides,
branford
Nov 2015
#188
Nope, don't agree at all. And 2/3's of those deaths are suicide. You think that will stop people?
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#226
I own guns and shoot guns but admit there is a issue with guns in this country. People like you.....
Logical
Nov 2015
#254
There are 9000 gun murders. The others are suicide. They would happen either way. nt
Logical
Nov 2015
#250