Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hedda_foil

(17,021 posts)
42. I think you're both right.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 08:55 PM
Dec 2015

There have always been war profiteers, as you say, merrily, as long as standing armies have existed. The Bush family is a prime example, starting with good old great, great grampy Sam and the company that vaulted him into the industrial stratosphere of Rockefeller, Harrington and Remington. (the Buckeye Steel Castings Company of Ohio.



..snip..

In the spring of 1918, Bush became chief of the Ordnance, Small Arms and Ammunition Section of the War Industries Board of Bernard Baruch and Clarence Dillon, with national responsibility for government assistance to and relations with Remington and other weapons companies.BUsh was essentially taking national responsibility for government assistance to his own Remington Arms Company and other weapon makers. Through these weapons manufacturers, Samuel Bush made and sold arms to 75% of the WWI combatants on both sides.

..snip..
Samuel Bush was labeled a "Merchant of Death" in the years following the Great War as investigations began into the instigators of the war and of the new emerging world militarism. The German Army under the Kaiser was the largest and most well armed in the world in 1914, and they were largely armed by Samuel Bush. After WWI, Germany was stripped of their arms, but Samuel Bush was allowed to keep his millions, and his arms business was allowed to grow and prosper. In 1944 he was awarded a huge government contract to make armor casings for WWII. He died shortly after the war ended in 1948, within months of the passage of the National Security Act.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x633661

And great grampy Prescott, who followed the family tradition of treason by trading with the Nazi enemy.

But there really wasn't a standing army until after WW II because, basically, it's unconstitutional. So after the war, there wasn't much of what could be considered a MIC. Fortunately, the Dulles boys and the generals were on the job, and managed to scare Truman about the red menace quickly enough that he jumped into the Korean War just a few years later. At least Truman caught on when General MacArthur wanted to expand his little war into China. Ike was brought in to stop the war, but the Rosenbergs gave Russia the recipe for the H bomb, and the arms race started, but even Ike had a lead time to figure out WTF was going on. It wasn't until sputnik, though that the arms industry really took off.

So Eisenhower publicly warned his successor, and Kennedy obviously took him at his word, trying to end the cold war and prevent atomic devastation, as well as firing Alan Dulles from the CIA. There's a lot of folks think those were the reasons behind the assassination.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Eisenhower was correct. Funtatlaguy Dec 2015 #1
You mean, West Point graduate Eisenhower who spent his life in the military, a good chunk of it merrily Dec 2015 #5
The military-industrial complex only really became powerful around 1958 starroute Dec 2015 #16
Do you have any links to support any of what you are saying? Samuel Bush was a figure during World merrily Dec 2015 #20
I have seen some of the old documentaries years ago where GM had to stop LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #29
OK, no links. Also, I am not connecting anything in your post to no MIC until 1958. merrily Dec 2015 #34
Whatever LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #35
I think you're both right. hedda_foil Dec 2015 #42
How, if at all, does what you posted relate specifically to the year 1958? merrily Dec 2015 #64
There have been profiteers in every war, aye. malthaussen Dec 2015 #65
He was warning people with no power about something about which he, as President, had done nothing. merrily Dec 2015 #68
Venerate him or not as you please... malthaussen Dec 2015 #69
Understanding the post to which you are replying is also important. merrily Dec 2015 #70
Rosie the Riveter... liam_laddie Dec 2015 #58
Eisenhower got us out of one war and kept us out of any others. former9thward Dec 2015 #40
I remember my dad being gone for a year in the fifties mountain grammy Dec 2015 #45
My dad's best friend from high school spent 3 years from 1949-1952 in South America. Major Hogwash Dec 2015 #53
Eisenhower took over in 1953... former9thward Dec 2015 #61
Eisenhower supported the CIA, he gave the go ahead for the Bay of Pigs invasion. Major Hogwash Dec 2015 #62
The Bay of Pigs was planned by the CIA during the last months of the Eisenhower adminstration. former9thward Dec 2015 #74
After consulting with Eisenhower. Major Hogwash Dec 2015 #76
Really? former9thward Dec 2015 #60
Oh pardon me.. mountain grammy Dec 2015 #72
He is no saint to me. former9thward Dec 2015 #73
Absolutely not! mountain grammy Dec 2015 #75
You left out nuclear weapons/nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2015 #37
I hadn't realized the major nuclear buildup only stated in the late 50s starroute Dec 2015 #38
this is the same ike who authorized one last U-2 flight over the Soviet Union Javaman Dec 2015 #48
It's strange to me they don't include the CIA with the MIC when discussing war. Major Hogwash Dec 2015 #54
allen dulles was an evil paranoid bastard Javaman Dec 2015 #55
The sheer ignorance.... Hekate Dec 2015 #59
A post whose only possible purpose is to insult a DUer seems like sheer ignorance to me. merrily Dec 2015 #66
oh yeah Hekate Dec 2015 #67
Just read my signature...Eisenhower was/is correct...!!!! Stuart G Dec 2015 #32
War will never go away: Its part of the human condition: Mankind has never been w/out lewebley3 Dec 2015 #51
The longest peacetime expansion in American history was when a Clinton was in office. onehandle Dec 2015 #2
As long as you consider bombing other countries "peacetime". (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #3
It's as though we're addicted, isn't it? This is your brain on war: merrily Dec 2015 #11
How much of your life have we been at war? kristopher Dec 2015 #39
Ever since I was born! Major Hogwash Dec 2015 #52
Sowing the seeds for the economic collapse of 2008, with merrily Dec 2015 #6
Somalia, Sudan, Bosnia, and Iraq might disagree with you there. n/t Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #7
You missed adding the sarc tag. What you typed is hilarious yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #13
+1 daleanime Dec 2015 #19
When you want to tout something it was "a Clinton." When its a bad mark, it's sexist morningfog Dec 2015 #25
Not all Clintons!!!! Iggo Dec 2015 #41
It may have occurred during Clinton, but started and purchased under Reagan. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #31
Bombing the living shit out of Milosevic is "peace"? Major Hogwash Dec 2015 #56
K and R (nt) bigwillq Dec 2015 #4
Good luck finding a time where the wasn't a war of some kind going on Lurks Often Dec 2015 #8
Yet some countries manage to avoid being at war. Scuba Dec 2015 #10
Only the unimportant and useless ones Lurks Often Dec 2015 #12
At least once.... daleanime Dec 2015 #22
War mongers big and small snort Dec 2015 #27
A war going on somewhere in the world is very different from what the OP is saying. merrily Dec 2015 #21
Yeah, kind of important. Hissyspit Dec 2015 #43
Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. KamaAina Dec 2015 #9
FWIW, a few European countries can easily make a similar claim... Blue_Tires Dec 2015 #14
The United States is a country that was founded on violence and the enslavement of people. jalan48 Dec 2015 #15
I would be interested to see a list of the 17 years we were not at war. tclambert Dec 2015 #17
War. It's the American Way. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #18
Maybe we should amend the Constitution and have Congress declare when we are not at war. kairos12 Dec 2015 #23
The world has only experienced about the same percentage in the past 3,400 years. Glassunion Dec 2015 #24
''A Cross of Iron'' or ''Theft in the name of National Security.'' Octafish Dec 2015 #26
Imperialist plutocrats know no boundaries, what's anyone else's is theirs they believe. They have Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #28
k and r Ivan Kaputski Dec 2015 #30
We should have wars: chknltl Dec 2015 #33
We should stop calling things wars that are not wars. That's how we got War on Terror. merrily Dec 2015 #36
Nowadays, Most U.S. Wars are Unnecessary gordyfl Dec 2015 #44
Perfect..war through the ages, same old shit. mountain grammy Dec 2015 #46
Duck vs Rabbit Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2015 #47
Dogs Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2015 #49
Religion...and...land. SoapBox Dec 2015 #50
"They" must really hate us for our freedom! Martin Eden Dec 2015 #57
Hail, Hail, Freedonia! Land of the Brave and Free! Ford_Prefect Dec 2015 #71
Ouch. jwirr Dec 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No wonder so many of us a...»Reply #42