Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(8,660 posts)

5. but, but, but, the private sector does it cheaper! the real question is . . .

Tue May 29, 2012, 11:35 AM

May 2012

which american tycoon can this company be traced back to? sounds more like corporate american bookkeeping to me.

ellen fl

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Contractor Accused of $750 Million Overcharge for Wartime Grub [View all] canoeist52 May 2012 OP

because it was easier than implementing the draft.... madrchsod May 2012 #1

Did they ever do anything with Halliburton and their ilk? Frustratedlady May 2012 #2

But they're job creators! gratuitous May 2012 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author ellenfl May 2012 #6

Private sector! More efficient! Cut costs! Not bloated! Blarrgh! Brickbat May 2012 #8