Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This event appears to be workplace violence, not terrorism [View all]bettyellen
(47,209 posts)39. Syed Farook, named earlier seems to be a former employee there.....
and several sources are now naming him and possibly his brother as shooters. Who the hell knows, if he lost his job, that might have radicalized him- same as the Boston bomber being a shit boxer in a dead end job.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I repeat, the Federal Government categorizes the Ft Hood shooting as workplace violence
philosslayer
Dec 2015
#21
I think the feds know how to put a guy in prison without making extra work for themselves.
Act_of_Reparation
Dec 2015
#87
Actually, I believe that with the passage of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act.......
WillowTree
Dec 2015
#99
Your verbiage leaves out two of the three shooters. They killed these people, not he, they.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#7
Yep. Most terrorists ALSO have their personal demons. Shooting up a building of strangers is
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#16
no, Major Hasan was not workplace violence, it was Islamic fundamentlist terrorism. What do you
still_one
Dec 2015
#19
I still think, like many unhinged killers he was spurned on by some personal failure...
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#42
NBC just spelled the name FAROOK. I'd like to know where you're getting your information from.
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#20
I guess it could be both. It obviously wasn't random, but there may have
TwilightGardener
Dec 2015
#24
I think when you target a group of strangers, it is terrorism. Most terrorists are failures at life.
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#51
Same reason a General Dynamics laid-off employee left his workplace,but returned the next week...
haele
Dec 2015
#103
I'm not sure, but it seems to me the guy who posted the OP felt he knew the motives...
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#59
Well... you sure went to great lengths to defend "appears to be", while arguing Hassan wasn't
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#86
The Federal Government can go fuck itself on that count as far as I'm concerned.
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#94
Workplace violence doesn't usually include others in masks and tactical gear
flamingdem
Dec 2015
#50
They were also very angry about things at their respective workplaces.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#77
well, we do have an important question that will need to be answered.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#89
It would be the first case ever of a disgrunted co-worker getting other people to help shoot....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Dec 2015
#72
Mark my words. This Saad Farooq will be the right-wing's wet dream
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Dec 2015
#85
if it were a lone shooter I would agree. multiple people involved tells me this is something more
rollin74
Dec 2015
#83
And he gets the award for the most awesomely prepared disgruntled employee yet.
peace13
Dec 2015
#102