Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This event appears to be workplace violence, not terrorism [View all]KamaAina
(78,249 posts)108. While we argue this point at DU, over on the right, it's a slam dunk
Teh evul Mooslim terraists are taking over 'Murka with that there Shari'a law!!11!11!! Today San Bernardino, tomorrow Washington, D.C.!!111!1!!11!!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I repeat, the Federal Government categorizes the Ft Hood shooting as workplace violence
philosslayer
Dec 2015
#21
I think the feds know how to put a guy in prison without making extra work for themselves.
Act_of_Reparation
Dec 2015
#87
Actually, I believe that with the passage of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act.......
WillowTree
Dec 2015
#99
Your verbiage leaves out two of the three shooters. They killed these people, not he, they.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#7
Yep. Most terrorists ALSO have their personal demons. Shooting up a building of strangers is
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#16
no, Major Hasan was not workplace violence, it was Islamic fundamentlist terrorism. What do you
still_one
Dec 2015
#19
I still think, like many unhinged killers he was spurned on by some personal failure...
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#42
NBC just spelled the name FAROOK. I'd like to know where you're getting your information from.
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#20
I guess it could be both. It obviously wasn't random, but there may have
TwilightGardener
Dec 2015
#24
I think when you target a group of strangers, it is terrorism. Most terrorists are failures at life.
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#51
Same reason a General Dynamics laid-off employee left his workplace,but returned the next week...
haele
Dec 2015
#103
I'm not sure, but it seems to me the guy who posted the OP felt he knew the motives...
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#59
Well... you sure went to great lengths to defend "appears to be", while arguing Hassan wasn't
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#86
The Federal Government can go fuck itself on that count as far as I'm concerned.
cherokeeprogressive
Dec 2015
#94
Workplace violence doesn't usually include others in masks and tactical gear
flamingdem
Dec 2015
#50
They were also very angry about things at their respective workplaces.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#77
well, we do have an important question that will need to be answered.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#89
It would be the first case ever of a disgrunted co-worker getting other people to help shoot....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Dec 2015
#72
Mark my words. This Saad Farooq will be the right-wing's wet dream
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Dec 2015
#85
if it were a lone shooter I would agree. multiple people involved tells me this is something more
rollin74
Dec 2015
#83
And he gets the award for the most awesomely prepared disgruntled employee yet.
peace13
Dec 2015
#102