Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jp11

(2,104 posts)
83. I will when it is appropriate and that is based on what I know which is often not very much.
Tue May 29, 2012, 03:59 PM
May 2012

If people in general were more aware of what being a soldier meant they might not feel the need to toss out hero to elevate what is already an elevated word. Being a soldier isn't an easy thing to do it doesn't need to be elevated with a word it should be elevated with many other things like better care in how they are used, cared for, paid, equipped, etc. Tossing out hero to me is a cheap way our country, especially people who are happy to send troops in, make it seem like they care, that mentality in this country doesn't help the soldiers. Some may even mean it but if it doesn't translate into treasuring those men and women who risk their lives to do what most people won't then really what is the worth of the word?

I'm not saying that is you I am saying that is how *I* see it when people say hero and they aren't talking about someone doing something truly heroic in combat/etc to save others. The other side of that is those close to someone injured or dead have every right to call them a hero no matter if they died in their sleep or manning a defense while under attack if it makes them feel better about their loss. I disagree but it isn't about me in that case it is about the person who suffered.

I completely disagree with your statement that serving means you absolutely endure far more than those who don't ever will I think you know that to be an unfair characterization ignoring all sorts of life events and hardships that others have endured and will continue to endure throughout the world. It is likely that someone in the service will have tougher experiences but it isn't guaranteed.

There are plenty of people who serve and never see any combat others still may sit inside an office building in their own country sleeping in their own bed every night.

Tell me please how is that 'enduring far more than those who don't ever will' what about a child in any country going to bed hungry night after night perhaps abused as well, or trying to care for your sick mother after your dad was killed by the local militia that comes to claim men to fight because he resisted? Or what about the young girls who get raped by the freedom fighters only to have them come back to kill the babies then rape the girls again?

Rinse and repeat. GeorgeGist May 2012 #1
Did someone train you to say that? Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #3
One doesn't have to be trained to recognize right-wing nonsense. nt TBF May 2012 #7
Except it isn't RW nonsense. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #10
Well I guess I part ways with our President on this topic - TBF May 2012 #18
that's not a fact, it's an opinion. cali May 2012 #49
Uggh Fascism 101 worship the military CBGLuthier May 2012 #2
So you send men and women to suffer the worst of what humanity can produce Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #4
Kind of a catch-22, isn't it? sadbear May 2012 #5
excellent Bacchus4.0 May 2012 #6
error: Kali May 2012 #9
I read that the SEALs who took down Bin Laden are paid less than Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #11
Navy SEAL pay is comparable to the average teacher salary. Brickbat May 2012 #20
Sorry, as much as I admire teachers, SEALs endure more than they're paid for. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #28
Comparing the two has little use. Brickbat May 2012 #40
I made the point because I was told Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #78
"So you send men and women to suffer the worst of what humanity can produce" white_wolf May 2012 #26
Now THAT'S some popagandist nonsense. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #29
There isn't a conspiracy. white_wolf May 2012 #30
Since Obame is CinC, let's translate what you just said. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #36
Yes, Obama represents the rich. white_wolf May 2012 #37
I don't think there is a monolithic group called "the rich" deutsey May 2012 #46
You're right. "The rich" is far too simplistic. white_wolf May 2012 #50
Agreed n/t deutsey May 2012 #53
Why are you trying to hide behind Obama here? Marr May 2012 #75
Because it's laughable on its face Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #76
"Nobody tells him where and when US troops go to fight" No they don't, though I believe Congress is Puregonzo1188 May 2012 #81
No one is saying he has a special red Bat Phone connection to Marr May 2012 #86
I'm not looking at any action in South America in the past century. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #88
You think our motivations in the middle east are *less* economic than Marr May 2012 #92
Essentially you are because you imply that electing Obama transformed the dynamics of the MIC TheKentuckian May 2012 #93
Or maybe people engage in looney conspiracy theories about evil cabals and world domination Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #95
Or caught up in a system much larger than himself, perhaps? deutsey May 2012 #99
Those "wars". sendero May 2012 #110
Those many wars since WWII have done more than just drain the treasury. baldguy May 2012 #111
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #39
Oh insults. Yeah, that's real mature. white_wolf May 2012 #41
Sent off for what? Arugula Latte May 2012 #45
No. YOU send men and women to suffer the worst of what humanity can produce. Zorra May 2012 #54
You pay taxes? sarge43 May 2012 #63
No. If you want it, you own it. Zorra May 2012 #102
Did you vote for Obama? Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #64
Yeah. Because I figured he'd cause less death and destruction than the only other alternative. nt Zorra May 2012 #103
This is where you are missing everyone's points. It's not a necessary evil since neither the Iraq Puregonzo1188 May 2012 #80
Wow! What NU said! nt Skip Intro May 2012 #113
"I view them as a necessary evil not an inviolate good." Taverner May 2012 #77
I have to agree with you - lynne May 2012 #8
What do we call anyone who gets up every day and does his/her job? Brickbat May 2012 #12
I understand that. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #21
If doing someone's job is all it takes to get called a hero, we need to seriously examine the word. Brickbat May 2012 #52
Excellent #s 12 & 52. I was going to say, One-who -performs- normal-civic- duties. n/t UTUSN May 2012 #69
couldn't have said it better myself . . . and i tried! eom ellenfl May 2012 #31
"To admire singular people for what they have done, however, is only human." Bluerthanblue May 2012 #43
Agree 100% NU. THose who are willing to sacrifice should be shown appreciation. Swamp Lover May 2012 #13
If we stopped calling everyone who joins the military a hero, more people might stop & think before Arugula Latte May 2012 #47
You assume that those who serve are stupid, or have not considered their decision. Swamp Lover May 2012 #58
Excellent point sarisataka May 2012 #61
A decent education in history Rittermeister May 2012 #89
Why do you, or anyone question why someone says anything that doesn't effect you personally? dadchef May 2012 #105
Anyone with two brain cells to rub together Arugula Latte May 2012 #106
People can appreciate and acknowledge service without calling them heroes. Brickbat May 2012 #59
our brave and selfless men and women? eom ellenfl May 2012 #14
Long periods of extreme stress does tend to make us band together like nothing else, Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #15
This is a powerful thought. Brickbat May 2012 #16
Thank you, NU bigtree May 2012 #17
I am a pacifist. I don't believe in heroes that carry guns. Th1onein May 2012 #19
In our family, all but two served in the military Greybnk48 May 2012 #22
I won't say "hero"... Spider Jerusalem May 2012 #23
especially when the rah rah shit is put out as some kind of litmus test Kali May 2012 #24
Another excellent point: "Service alone does not make them heroes." Brickbat May 2012 #42
well said paulk May 2012 #51
You summed it up nicely. RedCappedBandit May 2012 #87
Why do you assume they are sent war to Arctic Dave May 2012 #25
How about we stop using the word to descibe people we don't know anything about? Orsino May 2012 #27
I know. I married one. And back when we were dating he was still enlisted. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #34
Brave, honorable, admirable are all sufficiently proper terms.... Tommy_Carcetti May 2012 #32
It's a lot easier to say hero than victim of the poverty draft doing their best to get by LeftyMom May 2012 #33
Chew on this: RC May 2012 #35
Soldier? Armed Services Member? cali May 2012 #38
Answer and a question sarisataka May 2012 #67
It's just stupid. Do people with chronic illnesses count? cali May 2012 #79
The matter is choice sarisataka May 2012 #84
OK. How about people who choose to be part of an NGO? Or teach in the inner city cali May 2012 #85
Those I respect as well sarisataka May 2012 #96
You haven't been to the Mexican border or any local police department lately, have you? Comrade Grumpy May 2012 #91
Not in a few years sarisataka May 2012 #100
probably better to say absolutely nothing hfojvt May 2012 #44
Soldier, sailor, airman, marine, coastguardman, depending. sarge43 May 2012 #48
+1 TroglodyteScholar May 2012 #57
Thanks sarge43 May 2012 #68
+1,000,000 Johnny Rico May 2012 #55
I've always found "soldier," "marine," "airman," and "sailor" to be adequate. TroglodyteScholar May 2012 #56
"Employees." nt daaron May 2012 #60
And any military member you call hero sarisataka May 2012 #62
Cannon fodder for the ambitions of politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2012 #65
it's not as though "anything less" than hero is an insult or degrading or anything fishwax May 2012 #66
What's wrong with "GI" kentuck May 2012 #70
Some are "heroes" all are "brave".... soccer1 May 2012 #71
Noble... cynatnite May 2012 #72
Can we honor the veteran without glorifying the war? LiberalAndProud May 2012 #73
I find it amusing that many of the same people who complain about kids all getting trophies Marr May 2012 #74
A few are heroes. Most are just working stiffs doing their jobs. Bake May 2012 #82
I will when it is appropriate and that is based on what I know which is often not very much. jp11 May 2012 #83
Hero Angelshare1 May 2012 #90
Yet, I feel more like a fool than anything. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #94
When I fear to speak, I remember this sarisataka May 2012 #98
Willing to risk all ... but again, the question is, for what? Arugula Latte May 2012 #108
Allow me sarisataka May 2012 #114
Pray tell, Arugula Latte May 2012 #116
there is nothing heroic about killing innocent people quinnox May 2012 #97
Someone defended that guy here? Wow I guess I missed that. cherokeeprogressive May 2012 #101
yup quinnox May 2012 #104
I wonder which American hero did this? Arugula Latte May 2012 #107
Somehow I think that soldiers, rather than being SomethingFishy May 2012 #109
I have no problem saying hero for our militiary men and women, fallen or not. Skip Intro May 2012 #112
survivors ManyShadesOf May 2012 #115
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you won't say "he...»Reply #83