Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Listening to the GOPers, they're all talking as if Farook's radicalization is like some alien curse [View all]Yorktown
(2,884 posts)15. Not very convincing. Risk of Communism raised by Churchill.
The British government had grown increasingly distressed over Mosaddegh's policies and were especially bitter over the loss of their control of the Iranian oil industry. Repeated attempts to reach a settlement had failed, and, in October 1952, Mosaddegh declared Britain an enemy and cut all diplomatic relations.[40]
Engulfed in a variety of problems following World War II, Britain was unable to resolve the issue single-handedly and looked towards the United States to settle the matter. Initially, the USA had opposed British policies. After mediation had failed several times to bring about a settlement, American Secretary of State Dean Acheson concluded that the British were "destructive, and determined on a rule-or-ruin policy in Iran."[41]
The American position shifted in late 1952, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was elected U.S. President. In November and December, British intelligence officials suggested to American intelligence that the prime minister should be ousted. British prime minister Winston Churchill suggested to the incoming Eisenhower administration that Mossadegh, despite his open disgust with socialism, was, or would become, dependent on the pro-Soviet Tudeh Party,[42] resulting in Iran "increasingly turning towards communism" and towards the Soviet sphere at a time of high Cold War fears.
Engulfed in a variety of problems following World War II, Britain was unable to resolve the issue single-handedly and looked towards the United States to settle the matter. Initially, the USA had opposed British policies. After mediation had failed several times to bring about a settlement, American Secretary of State Dean Acheson concluded that the British were "destructive, and determined on a rule-or-ruin policy in Iran."[41]
The American position shifted in late 1952, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was elected U.S. President. In November and December, British intelligence officials suggested to American intelligence that the prime minister should be ousted. British prime minister Winston Churchill suggested to the incoming Eisenhower administration that Mossadegh, despite his open disgust with socialism, was, or would become, dependent on the pro-Soviet Tudeh Party,[42] resulting in Iran "increasingly turning towards communism" and towards the Soviet sphere at a time of high Cold War fears.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Listening to the GOPers, they're all talking as if Farook's radicalization is like some alien curse [View all]
MrScorpio
Dec 2015
OP
They want to say radicalization is bad, and they have no problem attacking where radicals live, but
ck4829
Dec 2015
#1
We're a country that has been at war all but 15 years of our existence.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Dec 2015
#6
The guy was born and raised in America, he is an American. Why do you avoid the facts?
Rex
Dec 2015
#27
Conditioning. "Terrorists" are set up in a way that they are supposed to be foreign, other
ck4829
Dec 2015
#29
Well, in a discourse, if there is an odd element sticking out, that causes reactions
Yorktown
Dec 2015
#30
I also mentioned before that sick is a relative term here, only in regards to ourselves.
MrScorpio
Dec 2015
#74
So would we be a "sick society" if we were talking about Columbine, Littleton, Atlanta bombings,
A Simple Game
Dec 2015
#35
People dying from riots and car fires are a possibility not the intent. But when
A Simple Game
Dec 2015
#70
Why do you forget the radicalized Christians in this country? Where do they come from?
KittyWampus
Dec 2015
#44
The thing I'm notibing this morning, on Morning Joke, is the desperation to blame Obama.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Dec 2015
#4
They found 12 pipe bombs. He was planning something far worse, but he fucked up.
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#18
Cheering at the notion that "all Muslims should be registered" is radicalization.
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#17
I never hear the right talk radicalization when it's a white Christian killing spree.
Tommy2Tone
Dec 2015
#51
Well, for one thing, the chances of Daesh establishing itself in this country…
MrScorpio
Dec 2015
#84