Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(9,766 posts)

2. They did not purchase the AR15s used in the attack

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 12:57 PM

Dec 2015

Someone else did. So they were either purchased and given to them, or stolen from whoever purchased them.

Either way, not legal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the terrorists moved up the date and changed the target [View all] TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 OP

They did not purchase the AR15s used in the attack B2G Dec 2015 #2

So what is your solution? nt B2G Dec 2015 #5

Make those sorts of guns illegal Photographer Dec 2015 #9

They also had handguns. B2G Dec 2015 #16

Please link to any meme. Kingofalldems Dec 2015 #3

A couple of posters on DU TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #7

Not just posters on CNN. B2G Dec 2015 #8

I'm confused here. What are you getting at? 951-Riverside Dec 2015 #6

Ok. TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #13

It was have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too BeyondGeography Dec 2015 #10

I agree with you ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2015 #14

and/or Locrian Dec 2015 #15

People are still denying this was terrorism? alcibiades_mystery Dec 2015 #12

if that scenario is true d_r Dec 2015 #17

I read somehwere they made deletions boston bean Dec 2015 #20