Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
95. Or maybe people engage in looney conspiracy theories about evil cabals and world domination
Tue May 29, 2012, 06:12 PM
May 2012

General Dynamics isn't forcing Obama to sign deployment orders. Either Obama is a hostage, a charlatan or a CinC doing his best.

Rinse and repeat. GeorgeGist May 2012 #1
Did someone train you to say that? Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #3
One doesn't have to be trained to recognize right-wing nonsense. nt TBF May 2012 #7
Except it isn't RW nonsense. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #10
Well I guess I part ways with our President on this topic - TBF May 2012 #18
that's not a fact, it's an opinion. cali May 2012 #49
Uggh Fascism 101 worship the military CBGLuthier May 2012 #2
So you send men and women to suffer the worst of what humanity can produce Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #4
Kind of a catch-22, isn't it? sadbear May 2012 #5
excellent Bacchus4.0 May 2012 #6
error: Kali May 2012 #9
I read that the SEALs who took down Bin Laden are paid less than Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #11
Navy SEAL pay is comparable to the average teacher salary. Brickbat May 2012 #20
Sorry, as much as I admire teachers, SEALs endure more than they're paid for. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #28
Comparing the two has little use. Brickbat May 2012 #40
I made the point because I was told Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #78
"So you send men and women to suffer the worst of what humanity can produce" white_wolf May 2012 #26
Now THAT'S some popagandist nonsense. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #29
There isn't a conspiracy. white_wolf May 2012 #30
Since Obame is CinC, let's translate what you just said. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #36
Yes, Obama represents the rich. white_wolf May 2012 #37
I don't think there is a monolithic group called "the rich" deutsey May 2012 #46
You're right. "The rich" is far too simplistic. white_wolf May 2012 #50
Agreed n/t deutsey May 2012 #53
Why are you trying to hide behind Obama here? Marr May 2012 #75
Because it's laughable on its face Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #76
"Nobody tells him where and when US troops go to fight" No they don't, though I believe Congress is Puregonzo1188 May 2012 #81
No one is saying he has a special red Bat Phone connection to Marr May 2012 #86
I'm not looking at any action in South America in the past century. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #88
You think our motivations in the middle east are *less* economic than Marr May 2012 #92
Essentially you are because you imply that electing Obama transformed the dynamics of the MIC TheKentuckian May 2012 #93
Or maybe people engage in looney conspiracy theories about evil cabals and world domination Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #95
Or caught up in a system much larger than himself, perhaps? deutsey May 2012 #99
Those "wars". sendero May 2012 #110
Those many wars since WWII have done more than just drain the treasury. baldguy May 2012 #111
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #39
Oh insults. Yeah, that's real mature. white_wolf May 2012 #41
Sent off for what? Arugula Latte May 2012 #45
No. YOU send men and women to suffer the worst of what humanity can produce. Zorra May 2012 #54
You pay taxes? sarge43 May 2012 #63
No. If you want it, you own it. Zorra May 2012 #102
Did you vote for Obama? Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #64
Yeah. Because I figured he'd cause less death and destruction than the only other alternative. nt Zorra May 2012 #103
This is where you are missing everyone's points. It's not a necessary evil since neither the Iraq Puregonzo1188 May 2012 #80
Wow! What NU said! nt Skip Intro May 2012 #113
"I view them as a necessary evil not an inviolate good." Taverner May 2012 #77
I have to agree with you - lynne May 2012 #8
What do we call anyone who gets up every day and does his/her job? Brickbat May 2012 #12
I understand that. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #21
If doing someone's job is all it takes to get called a hero, we need to seriously examine the word. Brickbat May 2012 #52
Excellent #s 12 & 52. I was going to say, One-who -performs- normal-civic- duties. n/t UTUSN May 2012 #69
couldn't have said it better myself . . . and i tried! eom ellenfl May 2012 #31
"To admire singular people for what they have done, however, is only human." Bluerthanblue May 2012 #43
Agree 100% NU. THose who are willing to sacrifice should be shown appreciation. Swamp Lover May 2012 #13
If we stopped calling everyone who joins the military a hero, more people might stop & think before Arugula Latte May 2012 #47
You assume that those who serve are stupid, or have not considered their decision. Swamp Lover May 2012 #58
Excellent point sarisataka May 2012 #61
A decent education in history Rittermeister May 2012 #89
Why do you, or anyone question why someone says anything that doesn't effect you personally? dadchef May 2012 #105
Anyone with two brain cells to rub together Arugula Latte May 2012 #106
People can appreciate and acknowledge service without calling them heroes. Brickbat May 2012 #59
our brave and selfless men and women? eom ellenfl May 2012 #14
Long periods of extreme stress does tend to make us band together like nothing else, Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #15
This is a powerful thought. Brickbat May 2012 #16
Thank you, NU bigtree May 2012 #17
I am a pacifist. I don't believe in heroes that carry guns. Th1onein May 2012 #19
In our family, all but two served in the military Greybnk48 May 2012 #22
I won't say "hero"... Spider Jerusalem May 2012 #23
especially when the rah rah shit is put out as some kind of litmus test Kali May 2012 #24
Another excellent point: "Service alone does not make them heroes." Brickbat May 2012 #42
well said paulk May 2012 #51
You summed it up nicely. RedCappedBandit May 2012 #87
Why do you assume they are sent war to Arctic Dave May 2012 #25
How about we stop using the word to descibe people we don't know anything about? Orsino May 2012 #27
I know. I married one. And back when we were dating he was still enlisted. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #34
Brave, honorable, admirable are all sufficiently proper terms.... Tommy_Carcetti May 2012 #32
It's a lot easier to say hero than victim of the poverty draft doing their best to get by LeftyMom May 2012 #33
Chew on this: RC May 2012 #35
Soldier? Armed Services Member? cali May 2012 #38
Answer and a question sarisataka May 2012 #67
It's just stupid. Do people with chronic illnesses count? cali May 2012 #79
The matter is choice sarisataka May 2012 #84
OK. How about people who choose to be part of an NGO? Or teach in the inner city cali May 2012 #85
Those I respect as well sarisataka May 2012 #96
You haven't been to the Mexican border or any local police department lately, have you? Comrade Grumpy May 2012 #91
Not in a few years sarisataka May 2012 #100
probably better to say absolutely nothing hfojvt May 2012 #44
Soldier, sailor, airman, marine, coastguardman, depending. sarge43 May 2012 #48
+1 TroglodyteScholar May 2012 #57
Thanks sarge43 May 2012 #68
+1,000,000 Johnny Rico May 2012 #55
I've always found "soldier," "marine," "airman," and "sailor" to be adequate. TroglodyteScholar May 2012 #56
"Employees." nt daaron May 2012 #60
And any military member you call hero sarisataka May 2012 #62
Cannon fodder for the ambitions of politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2012 #65
it's not as though "anything less" than hero is an insult or degrading or anything fishwax May 2012 #66
What's wrong with "GI" kentuck May 2012 #70
Some are "heroes" all are "brave".... soccer1 May 2012 #71
Noble... cynatnite May 2012 #72
Can we honor the veteran without glorifying the war? LiberalAndProud May 2012 #73
I find it amusing that many of the same people who complain about kids all getting trophies Marr May 2012 #74
A few are heroes. Most are just working stiffs doing their jobs. Bake May 2012 #82
I will when it is appropriate and that is based on what I know which is often not very much. jp11 May 2012 #83
Hero Angelshare1 May 2012 #90
Yet, I feel more like a fool than anything. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #94
When I fear to speak, I remember this sarisataka May 2012 #98
Willing to risk all ... but again, the question is, for what? Arugula Latte May 2012 #108
Allow me sarisataka May 2012 #114
Pray tell, Arugula Latte May 2012 #116
there is nothing heroic about killing innocent people quinnox May 2012 #97
Someone defended that guy here? Wow I guess I missed that. cherokeeprogressive May 2012 #101
yup quinnox May 2012 #104
I wonder which American hero did this? Arugula Latte May 2012 #107
Somehow I think that soldiers, rather than being SomethingFishy May 2012 #109
I have no problem saying hero for our militiary men and women, fallen or not. Skip Intro May 2012 #112
survivors ManyShadesOf May 2012 #115
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you won't say "he...»Reply #95