Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Neue Regel

(221 posts)
6. No, members of the clergy have to pay taxes
Tue May 29, 2012, 05:19 PM
May 2012
http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc417.html

Topic 417 - Earnings for Clergy

For income tax purposes, a licensed, commissioned, or ordained minister is generally treated as a common law employee of his or her church, denomination, or sect. There are, however, some exceptions such as traveling evangelists who may be treated as independent contractors. If you are a minister performing ministerial services, you are taxed on wages, offerings, and fees you receive for performing marriages, baptisms, funerals, etc.

The services you perform in the exercise of your ministry are generally subject to self-employment tax (social security and Medicare taxes). See Publication 517, Social Security and Other Information for Members of the Clergy and Religious Workers, for limited exceptions from self-employment tax.

Even though, for social security tax and Medicare tax purposes, you are considered a self-employed individual in performing your ministerial services, you may be considered an employee for income tax or retirement plan purposes. For income tax or retirement plan purposes, some of your income may be considered self-employment income and other income may be considered wages. Depending on all the facts and circumstances, under common-law rules you are considered either an employee or a self employed-person. Generally, you are an employee if the church or organization has the legal right to control both what you do and how you do it, even if you have considerable discretion and freedom of action. For more information about the common-law rules, see Publication 15-A (PDF), Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide. If you are employed by a congregation for a salary, you are generally a common-law employee and income from the exercise of your ministry is considered wages for income tax purposes. However, amounts received directly from members of the congregation, such as fees for performing marriages, baptisms, or other personal services, are considered self-employment income.

If you itemize your deductions, you may be able to deduct certain unreimbursed business expenses related to your services as a common-law employee on Form 1040, Schedule A, Itemized Deductions. You may need to fill out Form 2106 (PDF), Employee Business Expenses, and attach it to your Form 1040 (PDF), U. S. Individual Income Tax Return. Refer to Topic 514 for information on Employee Business Expenses, and Topic 508 for information on the 2% of adjusted gross income limitation. For your self-employment income (the offerings or fees you receive for performing marriages, baptisms, funerals, etc.), use Form 1040, Schedule C (PDF), Profit or Loss From Business, or Form 1040, Schedule C-EZ (PDF), Net Profit From Business, to report these earnings and related expenses.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NOT news, NO Leona Helmsley, elleng May 2012 #1
Not Leona Helmsley in the criminal, tax evading sense... Neue Regel May 2012 #2
Her 'attitude' is that the people of Greece should pay the taxes they owe. elleng May 2012 #5
how is it different? Who cares if she is exempt. roguevalley May 2012 #13
The difference is that those mid-and low-level employees DJ13 May 2012 #8
It is NOT the 'same thing they are.' elleng May 2012 #9
Lol. girl gone mad May 2012 #10
Nothing 'lol' about this, just some facts. elleng May 2012 #11
It doesn't matter whether people avoid taxes through legal shenanigans.. girl gone mad May 2012 #12
You're wasting your time ..... oldhippie May 2012 #16
I think you're right about that. elleng May 2012 #17
they should, the leaching bloodsuckers. No one roguevalley May 2012 #14
Yes, diplomats, UN workers, IMF employees should be able to be locked up at any time RB TexLa May 2012 #19
I guess working for the UN... orwell May 2012 #3
No, members of the clergy have to pay taxes Neue Regel May 2012 #6
She's far worse than Leona Helmsley. girl gone mad May 2012 #4
International Predator Class VIP pays no taxes on income, lectures others kenny blankenship May 2012 #7
Yep. It's not that her job doesn't require her to pay taxes.......... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #21
The rules are for the little people. The big people get special exemptions. HiPointDem May 2012 #15
Why am I suddenly thankful that some crazed dictator or some coup leader RB TexLa May 2012 #18
This is a stupid non-issue Spider Jerusalem May 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IMF boss Christine Lagard...»Reply #6