Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
3. Because it's not a proven technology.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 04:33 PM
Dec 2015

If cops adopted it and proved its worth over, say, 5 years, maybe the gun industry and owners will adopt it. Until then, nobody is going to trust their safety to a gun that may fire when it's not supposed to, or not fire when the user intends to.

In the long run, I think safes are the best bet. They only work if locked though. I recommend some sort of subsidy or tax write off for first time safe purchasers. I suspect the gun loathes will hate that though. Doesn't punish and shame gun owners enough.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whatever happened to biom...»Reply #3